Dismissed¶37

Smt Vasantha @ Vasanthakumari B K v. Smt. Budevamma

Karnataka HC9 Jul 2026WP/11100/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC writ petition dismissed for non-appearance; WP No. 11100 of 2021 (GM-CPC); petitioner Vasantha @ Vasanthakumari B.K. vs respondents incl. Budevamma, Vijayalakshmi, Renuka, Jalajakshi, Drakshyini, B.K. Sathisha, B.K. Girisha, H.M. Pavithra; sought quashing of IA V amendment-rejection order dated 23.03.2019 in O.S. No. 166/2016, Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Hassan; Order VI Rule 17 CPC; defendants 2-5 deletion; shares 1/7 to 1/4; dismissed 09.07.2026 citing order dated 30.07.2025; no steps taken; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

As none appeared and no steps had been taken, and in view of the order dated 30.07.2025, the writ petition is dismissed. ¶36

Smt Vasantha @ Vasanthakumari B K Vs Smt. Budevamma — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:34670 WP No. 11100 of 2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 11100 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT. VASANTHA @ VASANTHAKUMARI B.K., W/O SWAMYGOWDA, D/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT SHANKARIPURAM, OPP. SHIVANANDA SCHOOL, HASSAN - 01.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. PRATHEEP K.C., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B

¶15

Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

SMT. BUDEVAMMA, W/O ALTE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,

¶17

SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O UDARIGOWDA, D/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

¶18

SMT. RENUKA, W/O NAGARAJU, D/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, DODDI ROAD, HASSAN - 01.

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:34670 WP No. 11100 of 2021

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

SMT. JALAJAKSHI, W/O CHANDREGOWDA, D/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, UDAYAGIRI LAYOUT, HASSAN - 01.

¶22

SMT. DRAKSHYINI, W/O PAPANNA, D/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, UDAYAGIRI LAYOUT, HASSAN - 01.

¶23

B.K. SATHISHA, S/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

¶24

B.K. GIRISHA,

¶25

S/O LATE KEMPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.1, 2, 6 AND 7 ARE R/AT BYRAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 34.

¶26

H.M. PAVITHRA, W/O DHARMARAJU M.N., AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, MANICHANAHALLY VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 34.

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:34670 WP No. 11100 of 2021

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER ON IA V (U/O 6 RULE 17 OF CPC) DATED 23.03.2019 IN OS NO.166/2016 ON THE FILE OF ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HASSAN, IN SO FAR AS REJECTING THE PRAYER TO DELETE THE NAME OF DEFENDANTS NO.2 TO 5 FROM THE SUIT AND SHARES OF PROPERTY WHEREVER IT OCCURS IN THE PLAINT TO BE AMENDED AS 1/4 INSTEAD OF 1/7 VIDE ANNX-F.

¶31

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶32

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

None appears.

¶35

No steps have been taken.

¶36

In view of the order dated 30.07.2025, the writ