Allowed¶37

Parvathamma v. Badegowda G M

Karnataka HC1 Jul 2026WP/10978/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mandamus to Trial Court to decide pending Order VII Rule 11(a)/(d) r/w Section 151 CPC application (IA No.4) in O.S.No.172/2022; delay in disposal of application; writ under Article 227 of the Constitution of India; Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; Additional Civil Judge, Sira; Tumkur district; petitioners Parvathamma and others (defendants) v. Badegowda G M; 60-day disposal direction; GM-CPC.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Additional Civil Judge, Sira to dispose of IA No.4 in O.S.No.172/2022 within 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order; pending IAs, if any, closed. ¶37

Parvathamma Vs Badegowda G M — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:32561 WP No. 10978 of 2026

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 10978 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

PARVATHAMMA

¶9

W/O. LATE SANGAPPA, AGE 72 YEARS.

¶10

G.S. RAJASHEKAR, S/O. LATE SANGAPPA, AGE 48 YEARS.

¶11

MAHESH,

¶12

S/O. LATE SANGAPPA, AGE 46 YEARS.

¶13

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SAVITHA, D/O. LATE SANGAPPA, AGE 43 YEARS,

¶15

PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 4 ARE R/O. GOPALADEVARAHALLI VILLAGE, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 125.

¶16

…PETITIONERS

¶17

(BY SRI. MARADIRANGANATHA G.K., ADVOCATE)

¶18

AND:

¶19

BADEGOWDA G M S/O. MALLANNA.

¶20

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:32561 WP No. 10978 of 2026

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

AGE. 40 YEARS. RESIDING AT GOPALADEVARAHALLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 125

¶23

…RESPONDENT

¶24

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE LEARNED TRIAL COURT TO HEAR AND PRONOUNCE ORDERS ON I.A. NO.4 (ANNEXURE-C) PENDING IN O.S NO.172/2022 WITHIN A PERIOD OF THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

The present writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Trial Court to hear and pronounce orders on IA No.4 in O.S.No.172/2022, pending on the file of the Additional Civil Judge, Sira, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, who are the defendants in the suit, have filed IA No.4 under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) R/w Section 151 of the CPC on 21.06.2023, and so far, no orders have been

¶30

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:32561 WP No. 10978 of 2026

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

passed on the said application. Hence, the petitioners are before this Court seeking a writ of mandamus.

¶34

Considering the fact that the application is pending from the year 2022, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the Trial Court to dispose of IA No.4 expeditiously.

¶35

Accordingly, this Court is passing the following:

¶36

ORDER

¶37

i. The writ petition is allowed by requesting the Additional Civil Judge, Sira, to dispose of IA No.4 in O.S.No.172/2022 within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.

¶38

ii. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.

¶39

SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

¶40

SMC

¶41

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Parvathamma v. Badegowda G M

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvathamma v. Badegowda G M

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Atiq Jaffar Sait Vs Mrs Mildred Murthy

Sri. Champathlal B Jain Vs Sri Lakshmana

Jaya Pandey Vs R Lakhsmi

Smt. C v Bhagya Vs Sri. Rev. Samuel Ponnu Raj

Sri. B. N. Babu Reddy Vs Sri. B. N. Yema Reddy

Smt P Suma Vs Smt Lakshmi