Sri G Satish Kumar v. Andhra Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), WP No. 10777 of 2017 (GM-RES), Justice M.G.S. Kamal, order dated 10-07-2026: writ petition disposed of since alternate effective remedy available under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest, 2002; liberty reserved to petitioner to avail such remedy; time spent in prosecution to count towards condonation of delay if steps taken within 30 days of certified copy; interim orders extended till 30 days; challenge was to notice dated 3.3.2017 by Andhra Bank Koramangala Branch (R-1) to vacate and hand over possession of schedule property at Annex-N; filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate effective remedy; if steps are taken within 30 days from receipt of certified copy of the order, time spent prosecuting this petition to be considered for condonation of delay; interim orders (if any) extended till 30 days.