application. It is stated that in this case, there is sufficient material on record pleaded by the present plaintiff in the plaint paras. It is stated that the Trial Court observed that there are no proper pleadings in the plaint about the denial of Will and regarding the probating of the Will is concerned, it is submitted that the present plaintiff, who has filed this suit, has to stand on his own legs and cannot take benefit of any weakness in the defence. Moreover, the Will is given effect to and the name of Annappa was appearing as a manager of the joint family. PW2 clearly admits the arrangement accepted by the present plaintiff under the Will. The Trial Court has observed that in dealing with the prayer for amendment of pleadings, the Trial Court should avoid hyper-technical approach and adopt a liberal approach, but that does not bestow the applicant with an opportunity to introduce a new time-barred relief. As a general rule, the Court shall decline amendments, if a fresh suit on the new relief sought to be introduced, would be barred by limitation on the date of application. It is distinguished from the fact that where the amendment merely sought to introduce an additional or a new approach without introducing a time barred claim or cause of action, the prayer for amendment could be allowed even after
