Smt. Tayamma Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Smt. Tayamma Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:8001-DB WA No. 1893 of 2024

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH WRIT APPEAL NO. 1893 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

SMT. TAYAMMA W/O LATE SRINIVASA C AGED 63 YEARS

SRI MAHESH S/O LATE SRINIVASA C AGED 48 YEARS

Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

SMT. VASANTHA W/O R MAHADEV D/O LATE SRINIVASA C AGED 44 YEARS

SMT. S RAJESHWARI W/O M MAHADEV D/O LATE SRINIVASA C AGED 40 YEARS

SRI MANJUNATH S/O LATE SRINIVASA C AGED 38 YEARS

ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.105, 13^TH CROSS JANATHA BADAVANE

2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:8001-DB WA No. 1893 of 2024

HC-KAR

J P NAGAR NACHANAHALLI MYSURU-570 008

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI M B CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING

DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REP BY ITS SECRETARY

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT MYSURU-571 129

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MYSURU SUB-DIVISION MYSURU-571 129

THE TAHSILDAR MYSURU-HUNSUR ROAD MYSURU-571 105

MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MUDA) JHANSI LAXMI BAI ROAD MYSORE-570 005 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER

SRI L N GOVINDASWAMY S/O LATE SRI RAMA BHOVI AGED 72 YEARS R/AT NO.90/9 NAACHANAHALLI PALYA J P NAGARA

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:8001-DB WA No. 1893 of 2024

HC-KAR

MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE-570 008

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI M N SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-4; SRI T P VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R-5; SRI MANJUNATH G KANDEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-6)

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.11.2024 PASSED IN W.P.NO.24304/2021 (KLR-RES). THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

The present intra Court appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 27.11.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.24304/2021.

The aforesaid writ petition came to be filed by the petitioner/respondent No.6-Sri L.N. Govindaswamy s/o late Sri Rama Bhovi for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent-authorities to consider the representation dated 15.09.2021 and to restore the name of the petitioner or his

4 -

NC: 2026:KHC:8001-DB WA No. 1893 of 2024

HC-KAR

family members in the RTC and all other revenue records in respect of the schedule property. Further prayer was made for commanding the respondent No.5 to pay compensation in respect of the schedule property to the petitioner and his family members.

According to the appellants, they had moved an application-I.A.No.1/2024 for impleadment in the aforesaid writ petition, claiming to be the owners of the schedule property. However, the said application came to be rejected. The order passed by the writ Court rejecting the application of the appellants for impleadment in the writ petition is not the subject matter of challenge.

We fail to understand that if the appellants were not impleaded before the writ Court, how they can maintain this writ appeal in respect of the final order. Therefore, we are of the considered view that this writ appeal at the behest of the appellants is not maintainable inasmuch as their application for impleadment before the writ Court came to be rejected and they have not challenged the said order.

5 -

NC: 2026:KHC:8001-DB WA No. 1893 of 2024

HC-KAR

In view thereof, we dismiss this writ appeal as not maintainable.

In view of dismissal of the writ appeal, pending IAs, if any, do not survive for consideration and accordingly, they stand disposed of.

Sd/(D K SINGH) JUDGE

Sd/(S RACHAIAH) JUDGE

BKV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1