Dismissed¶30

Sri. Srinivasa H v. Sri. Chandrashekar H

Karnataka HC1 Jun 2026WA/1729/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ appeal dismissed for non-prosecution - no counsel or party appeared in first or revised call. High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; WA No. 1729 of 2024 (LB-BMP) under Section 4, Karnataka High Court Act; challenged Single Judge order dated 08.08.2024 in WP No.15365/2024 (LB-BMP); appellant Sri Srinivasa H; respondents incl. BBMP Commissioner and Assistant Revenue Officer, HBR Layout; coram D K Singh and Rajesh Rai K JJ.; judgment dated 01.06.2026 per D K Singh J.; pending IAs disposed.

What did the court decide?

Since no one was present to press the appeal in the first call or the revised call, the Court had no option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. ¶30

Sri. Srinivasa H Vs Sri. Chandrashekar H — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:25569-DB WA No. 1729 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT APPEAL NO. 1729 OF 2024 (LB-BMP)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. SRINIVASA H S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/AT NO 40/1, STANDAGE ROAD BESIDE SAVORY HOTEL KITCHN, FRAZER TOWN BENGALURU 560005

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI. TIMOTHY CHARLES, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K

¶15

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR H S/O LATE A HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.6/4, 6/5, 2ND CROSS, POOJA GARDEN, KALKERE, HORAMAVU POST, BENGALURU-560043.

¶17

THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP) N R SQUARE, BENGALURU-560002.

¶18

THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER KODUGONDANAHALLI ZONE HBR LAYOUT DIVISION,

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:25569-DB WA No. 1729 of 2024

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP) SHOP NO.6, BDA COMPLEX, OPP. KEB OFFICE HBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560045.

¶23

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANOJ S N., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. K.S.MALLIKARJUNA REDDY, FOR R2 & R3)

¶24

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN WRIT PETITION No.15365/2024 (LB-BMP) ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN WRIT PETITION No.15365/2024 (LB-BMP) BY THE HON'BLE SINGLE JUDGE ON 08.08.2024, FOR BEING CAPRICIOUS, IMPULSIVE, BIASED AS THE SAID IMPUGNED ORDER IS PASSED BEING THE BACK OF THE APPELLANT BASED ON A DELIBERATE AND WILL FULL SUPPRESSION AND MISREPRESENTATION AND MATERIAL FACTS BY THE 1^ST RESPONDENT IN ORDER TO OBTAIN A RELIEF, WHICH OTHER WISE NOT ENTITLED FOR, THEREBY AFFECTING CAUSING INCONVENIENCE TO THE APPELLANT IN DEFENDING THE PENDING PARTITION SUIT AND ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL, ETC.

¶25

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and

¶27

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

¶30

We have taken up this appeal in the revised call. No one is present to press this appeal either in the first call or in the revised call. In view thereof, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.

¶31

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:25569-DB WA No. 1729 of 2024

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34