Dismissed¶28

State Bank of India v. Sri U Vasulingappa

Karnataka HC10 Jul 2026WA/1454/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court writ appeal dismissed as withdrawn on amicable settlement memo; State Bank of India Asset Recover Management Branch / Stressed Assets Recovery Branch Hubballi (Authorized Officer S.E. Ravikumar) vs U. Vasulingappa, proprietor of M/s. Raghavendra Rice Mill, Sandur Taluk, Bellary; challenge to Single Judge order dated 19.09.2024 in W.P.No.19203/2024; filed under Section 4, Karnataka High Court Act; coram Vibhu Bakhru, Chief Justice and K.S. Hemalekha, Judge; dated 10.07.2026; pending interlocutory applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

As counsel for the appellant filed a memo stating that the parties had resolved the dispute amicably, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶28

State Bank of India Vs Sri U Vasulingappa — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:35015-DB WA No. 1454 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

¶8

WRIT APPEAL NO.1454 OF 2024 (GM-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

STATE BANK OF INDIA ASSET RECOVER MANAGEMENT BRANCH 2^ND FLOOR, A BLOCK, BKG COMPLEX, MYSORE BANK CIRCLE, AVENUE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560009 (NOW STRESSED ASSETS RECOVERY BRANCH HUBBALLI) REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED OFFICER MR. S.E. RAVIKUMAR. …APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI. SHETTY VIGNESH SHIVARAM, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶12

Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

AND:

¶14

SRI. U. VASULINGAPPA S/O LATE RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. RAGHAVENDRA RICE MILL NO.986, NEW DAROJI, SANDUR TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT, BELLARY-583121. …RESPONDENT

¶15

(BY SRI. M.S. CHANDRASHEKAR BABU, ADVOCATE)

¶16

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THE ABOVE WRIT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 19.09.2024

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:35015-DB WA No. 1454 of 2024

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.19203/2024.

¶21

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶23

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

¶24

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶25

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶26

None appears for the appellant. However, the learned

¶27

counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the parties have resolved the dispute amicably. Hence, the present appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28