Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Smt v Vasantha Vs Smt Alumelamma — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Karnataka HC
2026
Smt v Vasantha Vs Smt AlumelammaSmt v. Vasantha v Smt Alumelamma

Dismissed¶37

Smt v. Vasantha v Smt Alumelamma

Karnataka HC22 Jul 2026RSA/86/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RSA No. 86 of 2025 (PAR/DEC), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, Coram: V SRISHANANDA (single judge), oral judgment dated 22-07-2026; CNR KAHC010037762025. Second appeal under Sec.100 of CPC by Smt. V. Vasantha (counsel: Sri. Manjunath B.S) against respondents Smt. Alumelamma (since deceased, by LRs) and others. Impugned: judgment and decree dated 04.07.2023 in RA No.12/2020, I Additional District and Sessions and Special Judge, Ramanagara, partly allowing the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019 in OS No.132/2015, Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ramanagara. Outcome: appeal dismissed for non-prosecution — no appearance for appellant, office objections not complied with despite sufficient time. No merits adjudicated, no precedent cited, no monetary quantum.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.

Why is it important?

The appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution: none appeared for the appellant, and office objections were not complied with despite sufficient time being granted. No substantive issue in the second appeal was adjudicated. ¶37

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No relief granted; the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.

Issue for consideration

Whether the Regular Second Appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution, given that none appeared for the appellant and office objections remained uncomplied with despite sufficient time having been granted.

Court's answer

The appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution: none appeared for the appellant, and office objections were not complied with despite sufficient time being granted. No substantive issue in the second appeal was adjudicated.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

ORAL JUDGMENT — High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (Hon'ble Mr. Justice V Srishananda), dated 22nd day of July, 2026. Regular Second Appeal No. 86 of 2025 (PAR/DEC), filed under Sec.100 of CPC by Smt. V. Vasantha against the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2023 in R.A. No.12/2020 of the I Additional District and Sessions and Special Judge, Ramanagara, whereby the first appellate court had partly allowed her appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019 in O.S. No.132/2015 of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ramanagara (suit involving Smt. Alumelamma since deceased, by her LRs K.V. Krishnappa, K.V. Ramachandra, Puttalingaiah, Veerbhadraiah and B. Krishnamurthy). Disposition: none appeared for the appellant and office objections were not complied with despite sufficient time granted; hence the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No substantive question of law or fact arising in the second appeal was adjudicated; no precedent was cited or engaged; no costs or monetary amount awarded.

A

1 -

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:38354 RSA No. 86 of 2025

CNR: KAHC010037762025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF JULY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2025 (PAR/DEC)

BETWEEN:

SMT. V. VASANTHA D/O. LATE. VENKATAPPA W/O. BYRAVA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A NO.A/1, 26^TH CROSS, NEAR ANGANAVADI, INRANAGARA, GEETHAMANDIRA BADAVANE, RAMANAGARA - 562 159.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. MANJUNATH B.S, ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

AND:

SMT. ALUMELAMMA W/O LATE VENKATAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS

K.V. KRISHNAPPA, S/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/A KUMBARADODDI VILLAGE SUGGANAHALLI POST, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 128.

2 -

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:38354 RSA No. 86 of 2025

CNR: KAHC010037762025

K.V. RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/A KUMBARADODDI VILLAGE SUGGANAHALLI POST, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 128.

PUTTALINGAIAH S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/A MAYAGANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT - 562 128.

VEERBHADRAIAH S/O LATE MALLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/A NO.390, 6TH MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, 3^RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 079.

B. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE BASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A NO.6, 8^TH MAIN, 1^ST CROSS, SHAKTHI GANAPATHINAGAR, BASAVESHWARANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 070.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST

THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.07.2023 PASSED IN

HC-KAR

NC: 2026:KHC:38354 RSA No. 86 of 2025

3 -

CNR: KAHC010037762025

RA NO.12/2020 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS AND SPECIAL JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.11.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.132/2015 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

ORAL JUDGMENT

None appears for the appellant.

Office objections are not complied despite granting sufficient time. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA)

JUDGE

SNC

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the Regular Second Appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution, given that none appeared for the appellant and office objections remained uncomplied with despite sufficient time having been granted.medium confidence¶37
The court held
The appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution: none appeared for the appellant, and office objections were not complied with despite sufficient time being granted. No substantive issue in the second appeal was adjudicated.ratio¶37

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

CPC100¶26

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Judgment and decree dated 04.07.2023 passed in R.A. No.12/2020 by the I Additional District and Sessions and Special Judge, Ramanagara, partly allowing the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019 in O.S. No.132/2015.¶32
I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS AND SPECIAL JUDGE, RAMANAGARA · 04.07.2023
Prior proceeding
Original suit O.S. No.132/2015 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ramanagara, concluded by judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019, which the first appellate court's partly-allowing order in R.A. No.12/2020 was made against.¶32
Prior proceeding
First appeal R.A. No.12/2020 before the I Additional District and Sessions and Special Judge, Ramanagara, ended in a judgment and decree dated 04.07.2023 that partly allowed the appeal (this is the decision impugned in the present RSA).¶27

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
SMT. V. VASANTHA D/O. LATE. VENKATAPPA W/O. BYRAVA¶10
Sri. Manjunath B.S
respondent
SMT. ALUMELAMMA W/O LATE VENKATAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS¶15
respondent
K.V. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE VENKATAPPA¶16
respondent
K.V. RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE VENKATAPPA¶21
respondent
PUTTALINGAIAH S/O LATE KARIYAPPA¶22
respondent
VEERBHADRAIAH S/O LATE MALLAIAH¶23
respondent
B. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LATE BASAVAIAH¶24

Coram

AI extract

V SRISHANANDAauthor¶34

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 22 Jul 2026 · July
Registered: 20 Jan 2025
Case no.: RSA/86/2025
CNR: KAHC010037762025
Bench: V Srishananda
Disposal: Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
Case type: RSA

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from V Srishananda

Westend Heights Condominium Apartment Owner Welfare Association (Whcaowa) Vs Sri.Nagaraj
21 Jul 2026
Sri Chalapathi Vs Sri Munivenkatappa
21 Jul 2026
Smt. Nanjamma Vs Sri K N Narayanaswamy
21 Jul 2026
Smt Priya Vs Smt Jayamma
22 Jul 2026
Sri. Lakshmana Murthy Vs Munishamappa
22 Jul 2026
Sri Kenchappa Vs T Mallaiah
22 Jul 2026

Cite this judgement

Smt v. Vasantha v Smt Alumelamma, RSA/86/2025 (KA), decided on 22 July 2026.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

CPC100

View all statutes

Procedural history3

Judgment and decree dated 04.07.2023 passed in R.A. No.12/2020 by the I Additional District and Sessions and Special Judge, Ramanagara, partly allowing the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019 in O.S. No.132/2015.I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS AND SPECIAL JUDGE, RAMANAGARA · 04.07.2023
Original suit O.S. No.132/2015 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ramanagara, concluded by judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019, which the first appellate court's partly-allowing order in R.A. No.12/2020 was made against.
First appeal R.A. No.12/2020 before the I Additional District and Sessions and Special Judge, Ramanagara, ended in a judgment and decree dated 04.07.2023 that partly allowed the appeal (this is the decision impugned in the present RSA).

View full history

Bench / Coram

V SRISHANANDA

Parties & counsel