Dismissed¶81

Smt. Maramma v. Siddashetty

Karnataka HC25 Jun 2026RSA/81/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Partition suit, Mysuru courts; RSA No.81/2017 under S.100 CPC against the First Appellate Court's reversal of the partial decree in O.S. No.356/2009; no appearance by appellant's counsel on successive dates; abatement against deceased respondents R3(a), R3(h-i), R4(i-iv); appeal dismissed for non-prosecution without admission; no substantive adjudication of shares by this Court.

What did the court decide?

Noting the absence of any representation for the appellant, the appeal as against deceased respondents R3(a), R3(h and i) and R4(i to iv) stood dismissed as abated. ¶73

Smt. Maramma Vs Siddashetty — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:31724 RSA No. 81 of 2017

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 81 OF 2017 (PAR)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. MARAMMA

¶10

@ DODDATHAYAMMA, W/O LATE HUCHANNASHETTY, D/O LATE KARIMADASHETTY, SINCE DEAD BY LRS

¶11

1A. SMT MAHADEVAMMA

¶12

W/O LATE LINGASETTY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

¶13

1B. LOKESH

¶14

S/O LATE HUCHANNASETTY,

¶15

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶16

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B

¶17

Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶18

1C. SMT GAYATHRAMMA

¶19

W/O LATE MALLESH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶20

1D. ARAVIND

¶21

S/O LATE MAHESH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS

¶22

1E. AMRITHA

¶23

D/O LATE MALLESH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS

¶24

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:31724 RSA No. 81 of 2017

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

LRS 1A TO 1E ARE R/AT KODAGAHALLI VILLAGE, BANOORU HOBLI, T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 124

¶27

1F. SMT CHIKKATHAYI W/O ANGASETTY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT MANDAGANA HALLI VILLAGE, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 430

¶28

SMT MAHADEVAMMA

¶29

D/O LATE KARIMADASHETTY, W/O GUDI MARISHETTY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK - 570 010

¶30

…APPELLANTS

¶31

(BY SRI. SHRIDHARA K., ADVOCATE)

¶32

AND:

¶33

SIDDASHETTY S/O LATE KARIMADASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS

¶34

BASAVARAJASHETTY S/O LATE KARIMADASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

¶35

SIDDAMMA D/O LATE KARIMADASHETTY, SINCE DEAD BY LRS

¶36

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:31724 RSA No. 81 of 2017

¶37

HC-KAR

¶38

3A. CHIKKANNA NINGASETTY, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS

¶39

3B. SIDDAPPA S/O CHIKKANNA NINGASETTY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

¶40

3C. MAYAMMA

¶41

W/O LATE MARISETTY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

¶42

3D. PRAMILA D/O LATE MARISETTY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶43

3E. BHAGYA

¶44

D/O LATE MARISETTY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶45

3F. MAMATHA

¶46

S/O LATE CHIKKANNA NINGASETTY, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

¶47

3G. CHIKKANNA

¶48

S/O LATE MARISETTY, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS

¶49

3H. GOWRAMMA

¶50

D/O LATE CHIKKA NINGASETTY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶51

3I. RAJAMMA D/O LATE CHIKKA NINGASETTY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

¶52

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:31724 RSA No. 81 of 2017

¶53

HC-KAR

¶54

ALL ARE R/AT VAJAMANGALA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI - 570 010 MYSORE TALUK

¶55

SMT LEELAVATHI

¶56

W/O ANANTHARAMU, SINCE DEAD BY LRS

¶57

4(I). ANANTHARAMU H/O SMT LEELAVATHI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

¶58

4(II). YOGEETHA D/O ANANTHARAMU AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶59

4(III). SANGEETHA D/O ANANTHARAMU AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶60

4(IV). YOGENDRA @ NAGESHA S/O ANANTHARAMU AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

¶61

LRS OF RESPONDENT NO.4(I) TO 4(IV) ARE R/AT DOOR.NO.1188, 7^TH CROSS, SIDDAPPAJJI GUDI, SUNNADA KERI, K.R. MOHALLA,

¶62

MYSORE - 570 024

¶63

…RESPONDENTS

¶64

(R1, R2, R3(B TO G) SERVED VIDE ORDER DATED 11.06.2026,

¶65

APPEAL AGAINST DECEASED R3(A) DISMISSED AS ABATED VIDE ORDER DATED 11.06.2026, APPEAL AGAINST DECEASED R3 (H AND I), R4 (I TO IV) DISMISSED AS ABATED)

¶66

5 - NC: 2026:KHC:31724 RSA No. 81 of 2017

¶67

HC-KAR

¶68

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.4.2016 PASSED IN RA NO.493/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU. ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.06.2014 PASSED IN OS NO.356/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AND ETC.

¶69

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶70

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶71

ORAL ORDER

¶72

None appears for the appellant. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant.

¶73

This Court thus, noting the absence of the counsel for appellant dismissed the appeal as against 3(a), 3(h and i) and 4(i to iv) as abated. In the interest of justice, the Court listed the matter for 'admission' today.

¶74

Learned counsel for the appellant is absent and it is the plaintiff's appeal challenging the dismissal of the suit by the First Appellate Court in RA No.493/2014 setting aside the decreeing of the suit in part in OS No.356/2009.

¶75

¶76

NC: 2026:KHC:31724 RSA No. 81 of 2017

¶77

HC-KAR

¶78