Bharath Kumar v. Dr S D Ramaiah
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; RSA No. 635 of 2021 (Regular Second Appeal); Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice V Srishananda; decided 29 June 2026 (ORAL ORDER); parties Bharath Kumar s/o Late Paras Mal v. Dr. S.D. Ramaiah s/o Late Dodda Ningappa; appeal under Section 100 CPC against RA.No.87/2018 (decree 06.07.2020) confirming OS.No.160/2016 (decree 10.09.2018), courts at Bhadravathi, Shivamogga district; appeal dismissed as infructuous on memo of respondent's counsel (Sri Prithvi Raj B.N) stating appellant handed over possession of suit schedule property; liberty to revive if memo incorrect; advocates: Sri P.N. Harish for appellant; no precedent discussed; no costs or quantum.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as infructuous on the respondent's memo; liberty reserved to the appellant to revive the appeal by filing a necessary application if the contents of the memo are incorrect.