Dismissed¶¶52

B D Annaiah v. B D Vajra

Karnataka HC13 Jan 2026RSA/627/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RSA No. 627 of 2024 (PAR); NC: 2026:KHC:2112; High Court of Karnataka; Ravi V Hosmani; dismissed for non-prosecution; office objections non-compliance; no representation; Sec.100 CPC; RA No.12/2020; Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Holenarasipura; OS No.216/2014; Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Holenarasipura; Hassan District; decision dated 13.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

Listing on non-compliance of office objections for the fourth time, with no representation and objections remaining un-complied, indicated that the appellants were not diligently pursuing the appeal. ¶¶51

B D Annaiah Vs B D Vajra — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:2112 RSA No. 627 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 627 OF 2024 (PAR)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

B D ANNAIAH S/O DODDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, DODDAKUNCHEKOPPALU VILLAGE, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT.

¶9

&APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI NARENDRA GOWDA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

¶11

AND:

¶12

B D VAJRA S/O DODDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

¶13

Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

SUMITHRA H H W/O B D VAJRA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

¶15

B D MANJU S/O DODDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

¶16

ALL ARE RESIDING AT DODDAKUNCHEKOPPALU VILLAGE, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:2112 RSA No. 627 of 2024

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

PUTTASWAMY S/O HARUVEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

¶21

LAKSHMAMMA W/O SANNANAJE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

¶22

MANJEGOWDA B S/O BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

¶23

JAVARE GOWDA S/O KARI GOWDA

¶24

AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

¶25

KUMKUME GOWDA S/O KALASE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

¶26

8(a) MANJA S/O LATE KUMKUMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

¶27

8(b) LAVANNA S/O LATE KUMKUMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

¶28

8(c) SUNANDA W/O SHIVANANJA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

¶29

MANJA S/O CHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

¶30

ANNAPPA S/O CHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,

¶31

DODDEGOWDA

¶32

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:2112 RSA No. 627 of 2024

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

S/O CHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

¶36

LALITHAMMA W/O LATE NANJUNDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

¶37

SWAMY

¶38

S/O LATE NANJUNDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

¶39

NANDI S/O LATE NANJUNDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

¶40

14(a) BHAVYA W/O NANDISHA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

¶41

14(b) PRATHIKSHA D/O LATE NANDISHA, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS,

¶42

14(c) PREKSHA D/O LATE NANDISHA, AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS,

¶43

ALL ARE R/AT BEERANAHALLI VILLAGE, HALEKTOE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT.

¶44

&RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.12.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.12/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARASIPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.07.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.216/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOLENARASIPURA.

¶45

¶46

NC: 2026:KHC:2112 RSA No. 627 of 2024

¶47

HC-KAR

¶48

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶49

[CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶50

ORAL ORDER

¶51

This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for 4^th time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal.

¶52

Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶53

Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

¶54

Psg*

¶55

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21

B D Annaiah v. B D Vajra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B D Annaiah v. B D Vajra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Janaki Vs Paniraja Hebbar

Smt. Sujatha Vs Smt. Prathima N Achar

Sri. Basavaraju Vs Somegowda Dead by His Lrs Smt. Rudramma

Smt. N Rama Rani Vs Smt. v K Teja

Mayannagowda M G Vs Smt.Mayamma

Smt Bhagyalakshmi Vs Health and Family Welfare