Dismissed¶37

S Santhosha v. Smt Panchali

Karnataka HC25 Mar 2026RSA/623/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal disposed on withdrawal: Karnataka High Court, RSA No. 623 of 2023 (INJ), decided 25-03-2026 by Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur. Appeal under Section 100 CPC against judgment/decree dated 15.12.2022 in R.A. No.64/2019 (Senior Civil Judge and Principal JMFC, Tarikere) allowing the first appeal from judgment/decree dated 23.10.2019 in O.S. No.39/2013 (Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Tarikere). Dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo recording out-of-court settlement; pending IAs disposed. No issues framed, no holdings, no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn in view of the memo and submission of counsel for the appellants recording out-of-court settlement; pending interlocutory application(s), if any, disposed of accordingly. ¶37

S Santhosha Vs Smt Panchali — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:17055 RSA No. 623 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶8

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 623 OF 2023 (INJ)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

S SANTHOSHA S/O SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS OCC-GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE R/O DUGLAPURA VILLAGE POST: KASABA HOBALI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 114

¶11

Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

HARISHA S/O SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O DUGLAPURA VILLAGE POST KASABA HOBALI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 114

¶13

…APPELLANTS

¶14

(BY SRI. HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

SMT PANCHALI W/O MADAN D/O LATE GANAPATHI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O DUGLAPURA VILLAGE POST KASABA HOBALI

¶17

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:17055 RSA No. 623 of 2023

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 114

¶20

SMT BHARATHI W/O SEKAR D/O LATE GANAPATHI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O DUGLAPURA VILLAGE POST KASABA HOBALI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 114

¶21

MANI S/O VEERAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS AGRICULTURISTS R/O DUGLAPURA VILLAGE POST KASABA HOBALI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 114

¶22

KUPPA REDDY @ KUPPASWAMY S/O GANAPATI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS AGRICULTURISTS R/O DUGLAPURA VILLAGE POST KASABA HOBALI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 114

¶23

SMT LAXMI W/O KUPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS AGRICULTURISTS R/O DUGLAPURA VILLAGE POST KASABA HOBALI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT – 577 114

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:17055 RSA No. 623 of 2023

¶26

HC-KAR

¶27

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.12.2022 PASSED IN RA No.64/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND PRINCIPAL JMFC, TARIKERE, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.10.2019 PASSED IN OS.NO.39/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TARIKERE.

¶28

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶30

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶31

The learned counsel for the appellants submits that

¶32

he has filed a memo for withdrawal, which reads as

¶33

follows:

¶34

“It is instructed by the appellants that the dispute between the parties is settled out of the court and also instructed by the appellants to withdraw the above appeal.

¶35

Wherefore, it is humbly prayed that kindly permit to withdraw the above appeal in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶36

2. In view of the memo and his submission, the

¶37

appeal is dismissed as withdrawn .

¶38

¶39

NC: 2026:KHC:17055 RSA No. 623 of 2023

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41