Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru), RSA No.565/2014 (PAR), decided 02.06.2026 by Ashok S.Kinagi J. (oral judgment, sole judge) - defendant No.4 (K.M Santhosh) appellant; plaintiff Sannananjamma (since deceased, LRs substituted per order dated 22.02.2024) respondent No.1 - partition suit O.S.No.76/2006, Senior Civil Judge & JMFC T.Narasipura; first appeal R.A.No.368/2016? No: R.A.No.368/2011, VI Addl. District Judge Mysore - claimed 1978 prior partition supported only by Ex.D1 rejected for want of corroborative records/witnesses; items 1 to 7 admitted ancestral; balance properties held purchased from joint family nucleus absent proof of separate income; no substantial question of law under S.100 CPC; appeal dismissed, trial and appellate decrees confirmed.
What did the court decide?
The concurrent findings of both courts below that the suit schedule properties are ancestral and joint family properties of the plaintiff and the defendants, who are members of a Hindu undivided family with no partition effected between them, were endorsed; both courts below were held justified in passing the impugned judgments and no error was found therein.