Dismissed¶35

M/S Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust v. Smt R Rukmini

Karnataka HC5 Jun 2026RSA/30/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), RSA No. 30 of 2018 (DEC), Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust v. Smt. R. Rukmini & Smt. P.P. Annapurna; second appeal under S. 100 CPC against R.A.No.175/2016 judgment dated 23.09.2017 confirming decree dated 29.07.2016 in OS No.1287/2011; appeal pending since 2018 with notice to respondents returned unexecuted and no fresh steps; dismissed for non-prosecution by Justice V Srishananda on 05.06.2026; no merits decided, no precedents cited, no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

As no proper steps were taken for issuance of notice to respondent Nos. 1 and 2, the notices having been returned unexecuted and no fresh steps taken, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶35

M/S Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust Vs Smt R Rukmini — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:26976 RSA No. 30 of 2018

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2018 (DEC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

M/S. JAMNALAL BAJAJ SEVA TRUST HAVING ITS OFFICE AT WARDHA & ALSO AT 2^ND FLOOR, "BAJAJ BHAVAN" NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER COL. BALA KUMAR NAIR S/O. COL. NGK NAIR AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS C/O. VISWANEEDAM MAGADI ROAD, BENGALORE - 560 091.

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI. SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT N., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

SMT. R. RUKMINI

¶15

W/O S.J. JAVARAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO.160,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:26976 RSA No. 30 of 2018

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

NEAR MULKATAMMA TEMPLE ANJANAPURA LAYOUT KAMAKSHIPALYA

¶20

BENGALURU - 560 079.

¶21

SMT. P.P. ANNAPURNA W/O SRI. P.R. VENKATESH R/AT NO.17, 1^ST FLOOR, 6^TH CROSS ROAD, SHIVANANDANAGAR

¶22

BENGALURU - 560 072.

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE

¶25

JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.09.2017, PASSED IN R.A.NO.175/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DIST., BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.07.2016, PASSED IN OS NO.1287/2011, ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.SR.CIVIL JUDGE. BANGALORE (R) DIST., BANGALORE.

¶26

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

¶28

NC: 2026:KHC:26976 RSA No. 30 of 2018

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶31

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶32

Sri Shankaranarayana Bhat, learned counsel for the

¶33

appellant is present.

¶34

No proper steps are taken for issuance of notice to respondent Nos.1 and 2. The appeal is of the year 2018, still service is not completed. Since the notice issued to respondent Nos.1 and 2 are returned unexecuted and no fresh steps are

¶35

taken, Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶36

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶37

BK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

M/S Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust v. Smt R Rukmini

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust v. Smt R Rukmini

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Karthik Vs Smt Appi

Smt Susheela Vs Venkatesh Since Dead by Lrs

Sri. Cyril Dsouza Vs Smt. Sevin Menezes

Smt. Rathnamma Vs Sri. v. Manjunatha @ U.Manjunatha

Smt. Parvathamma Vs Munikrishnappa

Bhagyamma Vs Shivaramaiah