Dismissed¶30

Smt Puttamma v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC31 Aug 2026RSA/2094/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Puttamma v. State of Karnataka & Others, RSA No. 2094 of 2021 (DEC/INJ), High Court of Karnataka, decided 01.07.2026 by V Srishananda J. Procedural dismissal only: regular second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant, despite restoration by order dated 17.06.2026 subject to Rs.10,000/- cost to the Karnataka State High Court Legal Services Committee, neither deposited the cost nor appeared. Statute referred: Section 100 CPC. Underlying chain: OS No.157/2010 (Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Nelamangala, decree dated 31.10.2015) confirmed in RA No.26/2016 (Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nelamangala, 16.03.2020). No merits adjudication, no precedent on substance; citeable only, if at all, for the consequence of non-compliance with restoration conditions.

Smt Puttamma Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:32835 RSA No. 2094 of 2021

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2094 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT PUTTAMMA W/O LATE SRI GANGABYRAPPA, AGED 66 YEARS, R/AT HUCHANAPALYA DASANAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560 064

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. SRINIVASA K.N., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶13

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

REPT. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA

¶15

BENGALURU - 01

¶16

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU - 09

¶17

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU - 09

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:32835 RSA No. 2094 of 2021

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

4. THE TAHASILDAR

¶22

BENGALURU NORTH (TQ) KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU - 09

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SRI. SESHU V., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4)

¶25

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.03.2020 PASSED IN RA No.26/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2015 PASSED IN OS No.157/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA.

¶26

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

None appears for the appellant.

¶30

This Court by order dated 17.06.2026 allowed the application filed by the appellant and restored the appeal subject to payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- to the Karnataka State High Court Legal Services Committee. Since the appellant has not chosen to deposit the cost and nor cared to appear

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:32835 RSA No. 2094 of 2021

¶32

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

before the Court, the appeal stands dismissed for non-

¶35

prosecution.

¶36

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶37