Regular second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; appellants did not engage an advocate despite service of court notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:33083 RSA No. 1884 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1884 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
ALL ARE RESIDING AT MARKULLI VILLAGE, SHANTHIGRAMA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK - 573 220.
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…APPELLANTS
(SRI. M.T. LAKSHMINARAYANA AND OTHERES, APPELLANT NO.1 (ABSENT))
AND:
NC: 2026:KHC:33083 RSA No. 1884 of 2025
HC-KAR
MARKULI VILLAGE, SHANTHIGRAMA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK - 573 220.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR B.M. ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 (ABSENT))
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS IN O.S.NO. 597/2016 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HASSAN AND THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN R.A. NO.15/2022 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HASSAN.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Court notice issued to the appellants after accepting memo of retirement filed by learned counsel for the appellant is duly served as per the report of the process server of the District Court, Hassan.
Since the appellants have not shown any interest to engage any Advocate despite service of Court notice, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. M.T. Lakshminarayana
Smt. Rathnamma
Sri. Arun Kumar
Sri. M.K. Ashoka
Smt. Puttamma
V Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
