Dismissed¶40

Hanumaiah Died by His Lr S v. C H Hanumanthu @ Hanumanthaiah

Karnataka HC20 Jul 2026RSA/1803/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Summary dismissal for non-prosecution; RSA 1803/2022 (PAR), Karnataka HC, 20.07.2026; office objections uncomplied; filed under SEC. 100 CPC on 08.12.2022; challenges judgment/decree dated 18.11.2022 in RA.No.84/2014 (Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural) which set aside the OS.No.259/1999 decree dated 16.01.2004 (Prin. II Civil Judge Jr.Dvn, Bangalore Rural); Hanumaiah (died) by his LRs vs C.H. Hanumanthu @ Hanumanthaiah and others; counsel H.K. Kenchegowda; identifiers NC: 2026:KHC:37550, CNR: KAHC010574692022.

What did the court decide?

The regular second appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution, as office objections were not complied with despite sufficient time having been granted. ¶40

Hanumaiah Died by His Lr S Vs C H Hanumanthu @ Hanumanthaiah — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:37550 RSA No. 1803 of 2022

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

CNR: KAHC010574692022

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1803 OF 2022 (PAR)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

HANUMAIAH DIED BY HIS LR'S

¶11

HARSHA C.H S/O SRI. HANUMANTHU AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶12

ARUN KUMAR C.J S/O SRI. JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶13

KIRAN @ KIRAN KUMAR S/O SRI JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

¶14

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

SUDARSHAN @ SUHAS GOWDA S/O MUTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHALLEGHATTA VILLAGE, KUMBALAGODU POST, KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT.

¶16

…APPELLANTS

¶17

(BY SRI. H.K. KENCHEGOWDA, ADVOCATE)

¶18

AND:

¶19

C.H. HANUMANTHU @ HANUMANTHAIAH S/O HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

¶20

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:37550 RSA No. 1803 of 2022

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

CNR: KAHC010574692022

¶23

SMT. CHIKKAMMA W/O HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS

¶24

VENKATAHANUMAIAH S/O HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS

¶25

JAYARAMAIAH @ JAYARAMU S/O HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS

¶26

MUTHAIAH S/O HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

¶27

SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

¶28

THE DEFENDANT NO.1 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT CHALLEGHATTA VILLAGE KUMBALAGODU POST, KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.

¶29

SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA W/O RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT BINNY MILL K.P. AGRAHARA 1ST CROSS, 2ND CROSS ROAD 12TH MAIN, BENGALURU - 23.

¶30

SMT. MANGALAMMA W/O MAYANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.16/1, GARDEN SCHOOL ROAD FLOOR MILL BUILDING, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST GOWDANAPALYA, BENGALURU.

¶31

…RESPONDENTS

¶32

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:37550 RSA No. 1803 of 2022

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

CNR: KAHC010574692022

¶35

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.11.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.84/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.01.2004 PASSED IN OS.NO.259/1999 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL II CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DVN) BANGALORE (RURAL) DISTRICT, BENGALURU.

¶36

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶37

ORAL ORDER

¶38

Appeal came to be filed on 08.12.2022. Despite granting

¶39

sufficient time, office objections are not complied.

¶40

Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non

¶41

prosecution.