Regular second appeal in a partition matter was listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for the fifth time. With no representation and objections unaddressed, the High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:3197 RSA No. 1776 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1776 OF 2024 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI JAYARAM S/O LATE NARAYANA SINGH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT "NESARA NILAYA" OPP. DENTAL COLLEGE, ANEKAL MAIN ROAD, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 106.
…APPELLANT
[BY SRI NAIK N.R., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
RESIDENT OF SAMPIGEHALLI, BANNERUGHATTA POST, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 562 106.
SRI. N.CHANDRASHEKARAIAH SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S
NC: 2026:KHC:3197 RSA No. 1776 of 2024
HC-KAR
D/O. LATE NANDEESHAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O CHEEMASANDRA VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR, HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.01.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.5040/2014 ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, ANEKAL ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 9.10.2014 PASSED IN OS NO.2206/2006 (OLD OS NO.307/2001) ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT ANEKAL.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 79
AV
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Jayaram S/o Late Narayana Singh
Smt. Parvathamma W/o Basappa
Sri Shankarappa S/o Late Nandeshaiah
Sri N. Chandrashekaraiah (dead, by LRs)
Smt. Rathnamma W/o Chandrashekar
Sri N. Ramaraju S/o Late Narasaraju
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
