The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a regular second appeal for non-prosecution on the ground that the appellants failed to address repeated court objections after sufficient opportunities.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to comply with court objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:3976 RSA No. 1610 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1610 OF 2024 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANTS
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SRI B R SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
NC: 2026:KHC:3976 RSA No. 1610 of 2024
HC-KAR
W/O LATE VEERABHADREGOWDA
DEFENDANTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE R/OF SIDDARAMANAHUNDI VILLAGE, YADAKOLA POST, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK.
THE DEFENDANTS NO.5 AND 6 ARE R/AT NO.7, 7TH CROSS, HOSABEEDHI, NEAR BUS STAND, KUMBARAKOPPAL, MYSORE-583231
…RESPONDENTS
HC-KAR
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.03.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.128/2019 ON THE FILE OF PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.02.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.801/2011 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSURU, AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 59
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the regular second appeal should be allowed to proceed where the appellants have failed to comply with office objections five times.
Sri S.V. Ramegowda
Smt. Sharadamma
Sri S.V. Rajanna
Smt. Mangalamma
Sri Veerabhadrsegowda
Sri Shivan
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
