Dismissed¶44

Puttaswamy v. Motegowda Since Dead by His Lrs

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2026RSA/1547/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of Regular Second Appeal on counsel's memo; liberty to file CRP against order in R.A.40/2011 & O.S.392/1996; RSA under Sec. 100 CPC against dismissal of execution petition Ex. No. 319/2012 by II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Bhadravathi; Karnataka High Court, 2026; no merits adjudication; single judge (V Srishananda, J.).

What did the court decide?

Appeal permitted to be withdrawn via counsel's memo; liberty granted to the appellants to challenge the order in R.A.40/2011 & O.S.392/1996 by way of CRP. ¶44

Puttaswamy Vs Motegowda Since Dead by His Lrs — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:26235 RSA No. 1547 of 2023

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1547 OF 2023 (SP)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

PUTTASWAMY

¶9

S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGE 60 YEARS,

¶10

OCC. AGRICULTURE

¶11

RAMAKRISHNA

¶12

S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGE 50 YEARS,

¶13

OCC. AGRICULTURE

¶14

BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF HOSASIDDAPURA VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK - 577 301, SHIMOGA DISTRICT.

¶15

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B

¶16

Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶17

(BY SRI. PRASAD B S.,ADVOCATE)

¶18

AND:

¶19

…APPELLANTS

¶20

MOTEGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS

¶21

1A. VARALAKSHMI W/O MOTEGOWDA AGE 50 YEARS,

¶22

1B. MOHANA KUMARA S/O MOTEGOWDA AGE 30 YEARS,

¶23

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:26235 RSA No. 1547 of 2023

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

1C. VINODA KUMARA S/O MOTEGOWDA AGE 28 YEARS,

¶26

1D. YASHODA D/O MOTEGOWDA AGE 26 YEARS,

¶27

R/O DANDIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KARADAHALLI POST, NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 445

¶28

BHADRE GOWDA S/O KARI GOWDA AGE 55 YEARS,

¶29

SMT. PUTTALINGAMMA W/O BHADRE GOWDA AGE 45 YEARS,

¶30

RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF NANJAPURA ROAD, NEAR ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, HOSASIDDAPURA VILLAGE - 577 301, BHADRAVATHI TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT.

¶31

…RESPONDENTS

¶32

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.01.2022 PASSED IN EX. NO. 319/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI DISMISSING THE EX. PETITION.

¶33

¶34

NC: 2026:KHC:26235 RSA No. 1547 of 2023

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

¶37

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶38

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶39

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶40

Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo.

¶41

Memo reads as under;

¶42

"That the as against the order of the R.A.40/2011 & O.S.392/1996. The CRP is maintainable. Hence the Appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal and liberty may be given to the appellant to challenge the above said order. Hence, this Memo".

¶43

Placing the memo on record, the appeal stands

¶44

dismissed with liberty as prayed for.

¶45

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶46

SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30

Puttaswamy v. Motegowda Since Dead by His Lrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Puttaswamy v. Motegowda Since Dead by His Lrs

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Soundari Vs Sri Sanne Gowda

Shanthamma Vs Siddappa

Lakshmamma Vs Hanumantharayappa

Sri Siddappa Vs Thimmappa

Sri Thippanna Vs Smt Poojamma

Sri. Chikkegowda Vs Sri. C. T. Ramesha