Regular second appeal against concurrent decrees in a partition suit was dismissed for non-prosecution after appellants repeatedly failed to comply with office objections despite time and a cost of Rs.500 being granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1456 OF 2022 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE R/O S.R. PALYA VILLAGE, NIDAGAL HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK.
Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
HC-KAR
W/O RANGANATHA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O AUTO RAJANNA BUILDING, NEAR ATTI LAKKAMMA TEMPLE, MALLASANDRA, NAGASANDRA POST HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D, ADVOCATE ( ABSENT))
AND:
SMT. ANASUYAMMA, W/O ERANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O JANGAMARAHALLI VILLAGE, NIDAGAR HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK.
…RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.02.2021 PASSED IN RA.NO.89/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PAVAGADA. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.07.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.497/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., PAVAGADA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
NC: 2026:KHC:1062 RSA No. 1456 of 2022
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
This matter is listed for V time for non-compliance of office objections. Though sufficient time was granted, appellants have not complied with office objections. Even though two weeks' time was granted, on payment of cost of Rs.500/- to comply with office objections, on 07.12.2023, appellant has not complied with same. This would indicate that appellant is not diligent in pursuing appeal.
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. ALPURA THIMMANNA S/O LATE GOVINDAPPA
SRI. JUNJANNA @ JUNGE GOWDA S/O ALPURA THIMMANNA
SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI W/O PARAMESWARAPPA
SMT. MANJULA W/O ERANNA
SMT. SRIDEVI W/O RANGANATHA
SMT. ANASUYAMMA, W/O ERANNA
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
