Smt. M. T. Kausalya v. Smt. Chinnamma

Karnataka HC19 Jun 2026RSA/1225/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; paper books not filed; RSA No. 1225 of 2022 (INJ); Karnataka High Court; Section 100 CPC; RA.No.7/2021; OS No.95/19; Somwarpete/Kodagu property suit; parties Kausalya v. Chinnamma and others; decided 19.06.2026 by V Srishananda J.; no merits decided, no precedent value on the underlying dispute — not suitable for citation on substantive propositions.

What did the court decide?

The Regular Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because paper books were not filed; no adjudication of the merits of the dispute took place. ¶37

Smt. M. T. Kausalya Vs Smt. Chinnamma — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:30284 RSA No. 1225 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶8

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1225 OF 2022 (INJ)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT. M. T. KAUSALYA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS W/O SRI. M. S. THAMMAYYACHAR R/AT: MULLUR VILLAGE SHANIVARASANTHE HOBLI SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT-571235.

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI. MADHU J.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VENKATESH R BHAGAT., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SMT. CHINNAMMA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

¶16

W/O LATE M J VISHWANATHACHAR

¶17

SRI M V LINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS S/O LATE M J VISHWANATHACHAR

¶18

SRI M V NANDISHA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS S/O LATE M J VISHWANATHACHAR

¶19

ALL ARE R/AT: MULLUR VILLAGE SHANIVARASANTHE HOBLI

¶20

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:30284 RSA No. 1225 of 2022

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT-571235.

¶23

SRI M G JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

¶24

SRI M G UDAYA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

¶25

SMT M G BHAVANI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶26

SMT M G MENAKI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶27

NO. 4 TO 7 ARE R/A HONNEKOPLU, MULLUR VILLAGE NIDTHA POST SHANIVARASANTHE HOBLI SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT-571235.

¶28

…RESPONDENTS

¶29

(BY SRI. JAGADEESHACHARI., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 R4 TO R7 SERVED)

¶30

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.04.2022 PASSED IN RA.No.7/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SOMWARPETE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2021 PASSED IN OS No.95/19 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SOMWARPETE AND ETC.

¶31

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:30284 RSA No. 1225 of 2022

¶33

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶36

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶37