Dismissed¶19

Smt. Akkamahadevi W/O Naganagouda Hiregoudar v. Smt. Lalita W/O Basanagouda Patil

Peremptory dismissal for default – Non-compliance of office objections

Karnataka HC24 Jul 2026RSA/100845/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RSA No. 100845/2025 (SP), High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad, decided 14.01.2026 by Addl. Registrar (Judicial) Jerald Rudolph Mendonca: Memorandum of Regular Second Appeal under Sec. 100 of Civil Procedure Code dismissed peremptorily for non-compliance of office objections under Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of the Karnataka High Court Rules; appellant and counsel absent; liberty reserved to seek setting aside of the peremptory order under Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3); no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

The Registrar has the power under Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of the Karnataka High Court Rules to pass a peremptory order of dismissal if compliance is not made within the time extended. ¶13

Smt. Akkamahadevi W/O Naganagouda Hiregoudar Vs Smt. Lalita W/O Basanagouda Patil — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

RSA NO. 100845/2025 (SP)

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD

¶3

[SMT. AKKAMAHADEVI W/O NAGANAGOUDA HIREGOUDAR AND OTHERS VS. SMT. LALITA W/O BASANAGOUDA PATIL AND OTHERS]

¶4

14.01.2026 (VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING)

¶5

CORAM: ADDL. REGISTRAR JUDICIAL

¶6

ORAL ORDER

¶7

Case is called out.

¶8

The learned Counsel for the Appellant is absent.

¶9

As per Order dated : 17.11.2025, this case is listed on this day

¶10

for dismissal for non-compliance of the office objections.

¶11

But, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity and inspite of specific order on 17.11.2025 that, if the office objections are not complied, the matter would be listed for dismissal on this day, the office objections are not complied.

¶12

The learned Counsel for the Appellant is also absent. This shows that, the Appellant is not interested in proceeding with the matter.

¶13

As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the Registrar has the power to pass a peremptory order of dismissal, if the compliance is not made within the time extended.

¶14

As per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules, the party is entitled to apply for setting aside the peremptory order by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject.

¶15

¶16

RSA NO. 100845/2025 (SP)

¶17

Hence, the following Order is passed by exercising the powers as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(2) of Karnataka High Court Rules.

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The Memorandum of Regular Second Appeal filed by the Appellant under Sec. 100 of Civil Procedure Code is dismissed for non-compliance of the office objections, with no order as to costs.

¶20

The Appellant is entitled to apply for setting aside this Order by making an application to the Court having assignment of the subject as per Chapter-XII, Rule 14(3) of Karnataka High Court Rules, 1959.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

(JERALD RUDOLPH MENDONCA) ADDL. REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) & NOMINATED REGISTRAR

¶23

List No.: 56 Sl No.: 67

Smt. Akkamahadevi W/O Naganagouda Hiregoudar v. Smt. Lalita W/O Basanagouda Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Akkamahadevi W/O Naganagouda Hiregoudar v. Smt. Lalita W/O Basanagouda Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Iqbal S/O. Abdul Munaf Bagewadi Vs Mohammaed Hanif S Siddieque

Sri.Jeevanagouda Vs Sri.Gadigeppa

Sri. Ningappa Vs Sri. Gadigeppa

Shivanagouda S/O Kallangouda Patil Vs Shivakumar S/O Veeranna Parande

Siddanagouda S/O Kallangouda Patil,. Vs Basavaraj S/O Veeranna Parande

Nagappa S/O. Shankrappa Nandihalli Vs Bhemappa S/O. Nagappa Nandihalli