High Court of Karnataka (Dharwad Bench), RP No. 95 of 2026 (NC: 2026:KHC:15776). Petition concerning action initiated by secured creditors under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (short form/year illegible). The text records that this Court had disposed of an earlier writ petition (number illegible), referring to judgments and decrees in two matters (numbers illegible), and had opined that the petitioners — having lost their case that the third respondent could not have mortgaged the property because it is ancestral, and not being entitled to half a share in the subject property — cannot succeed in their challenge to the SARFAESI Act action. Counsel sought review of the order (date illegible), contending those judgments and decrees were pending consideration and not placed before the Court, and invoked the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act for the first petitioner, stated to be a senior citizen (age illegible). The Court held there is no reason for review, noted an alternative remedy under the SARFAESI Act (section illegible) where the pendency of those judgments and decrees could be pointed out, and the petition stands disposed of accordingly. CAVEAT: the source text is heavily corrupted (font-encoding mojibake); all party names, advocate names, judge name, dates, case numbers, section numbers and monetary figures are illegible. Substantive content above was recovered through a consistent glyph-substitution mapping validated across the legible body text and must be verified against the original PDF before citation.
