Smt. Gangahanumakka Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Smt. Gangahanumakka Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:10064-DB RP No. 589 of 2025

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REVIEW PETITION NO.589 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

SMT. GANGAHANUMAKKA

W/O. LATE NARASAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,

SMT. LAKSHMI

D/O. LATE NARASAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

Digitally signed by RAKSHA Location: High Court of Karnataka

SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR

S/O. LATE NARASAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,

ALL ARE RESIDING AT

BOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE,

KASABA HOBLI,

NELAMANGALA TALUK,

2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:10064-DB RP No. 589 of 2025

HC-KAR

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 123.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SR. ADV. FOR SRI. R. KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

REVENUE DEPARTMENT,

M.S. BUILDING,

BENGALURU-560 001.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

DC OFFICE,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,

BEERASANDRA VILLAGE,

KUNDHANA HOBLI,

DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562 110.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION,

DODDABALLAPURA-561 203.

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:10064-DB RP No. 589 of 2025

HC-KAR

SMT. JAYAMMA W/O. LATE CHOWDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

SMT. RADHA D/O. LATE CHOWDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

SRI. MUNIRAJU S/O. LATE CHOWDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

SMT. PADMA D/O. LATE CHOWDAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,

SRI. NAGARAJU S/O. NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

RESPONDENT NO.4 TO 8

ARE RESIDING AT BOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI,

NELAMANGALA TALUK,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 123.

SRI. JAYARAM S/O. ANDHANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:10064-DB RP No. 589 of 2025

HC-KAR

NO.1, BYRAVA NILAYA, JAYARAM BUILDING,

NEAR VISHAL ENGLISH SCHOOL,

SRIKANTAPURA,

BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560 073.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)

THIS RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER

XLVII RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DT:24.11.2025 PASSED BY THIS COURT

IN W.A.NO.920/2023 (SC-ST) VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

5 -

NC: 2026:KHC:10064-DB RP No. 589 of 2025

HC-KAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)

This review petition is filed seeking review of the order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.920/2023 (SC-ST).

Sri. Ashok Haranahalli, learned Senior counsel appearing for the review petitioners submits that this Court has committed an error in paragraph No.7(f) recording the finding, that the finding recorded by the learned Single Judge is based on analyzing the Grant order. However, no Grant order was placed nor original records were placed. It is further submitted that the review petitioners have specifically pleaded that the permission granted to alienate the property, was expired. The said aspect was not considered and he seeks to review of the judgment.

We have perused the Order under review and notice that the observations made at paragraph No.7(f) is nothing but reiteration of finding recorded by the learned Single Judge. We have considered all the contentions urged in the appeal, we do

6 -

NC: 2026:KHC:10064-DB RP No. 589 of 2025

HC-KAR

not find any error in the order passed. The review petition is

devoid of merits and the same is accordingly rejected .

Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15