Sri. Ameer Sab v. Abdul Khalak
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; Review Petition RP No. 7 of 2023 (R.S.S. No. 1620/2013); decided 04-02-2026 by single judge Sachin Shankar Magadum; review dismissed. Keywords: scope of review, Order XLVII Rules 1 and 2 CPC, error apparent on face of record, sine qua non, no reappreciation of facts, no re-opening of adjudicated issues, derivative/independent claim through Bhatlunnissa (plaintiff No.6), wife of review petitioner, daughter of Jaharabee, concurrent invalidation of sale deed by three Courts, appropriate proceedings known to law, Tumkur, cause title cites Section 47 Rule 1 CPC 1908.
What did the court decide?
No error apparent on the face of the record is either pleaded or demonstrated; the scope of review under Order XLVII Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure is extremely limited and does not permit reappreciation of facts or re-opening of issues already adjudicated. The plea proceeds on an entirely different footing and does not expose any patent illegality, manifest error, or mistake apparent on the face of the record.