Mr. Sunil Panicker, v. Ms. Gracemary Cherian
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, RFA No. 784 of 2025 (INJ), NC: 2026:KHC:584, oral judgment dated 06-01-2026 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum. Appeal under SEC.96 CPC challenging an order passed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC (order dated 15.01.2025, OS No.7094/2024, XXIV Additional and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru; suit dismissed as withdrawn as per memo) held not maintainable; office objections upheld; appeal dismissed; liberty reserved to appellant to pursue remedy under Order 43 CPC. Parties: Sunil Panicker (appellant; advocate Vijay .B.K) v. Gracemary Cherian (respondent). No precedents engaged; no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Appellant reserved with liberty to avail remedy as provided under Order 43 of CPC; Registry directed to forthwith return certified copies after securing photocopies. ¶24