Dismissed¶60

K B Chandra Bai v. K B Chandra Ban Singh

Karnataka HC6 Feb 2026RFA/74/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RFA No. 74 of 2019 (High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru) under Section 96 CPC against judgment/decree dated 06.10.2018 in OS.No.10993/2006 (XXXIV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru); dismissed for non-prosecution on 06.02.2026 by Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde after repeated absence of appellants' representation; pending interlocutory application does not survive; appeal earlier dismissed against R-5, R-6 and R-8 vide order dated 12.09.2024.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, the appellants having made no representation on repeated listings. ¶60

K B Chandra Bai Vs K B Chandra Ban Singh — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:7291 RFA No. 74 of 2019

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

¶7

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 74 OF 2019 (PAR)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

K.B.CHANDRA BAI

¶10

W/O.LATE C.RAGHUNATH SINGH

¶11

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

¶12

R/AT NO.205, SANJAY NAGAR 3^RD CROSS, TIMBER LAYOUT MYSORE ROAD

¶13

BENGALURU-560 026

¶14

KANTHA BAI

¶15

W/O.ANANTHA RAM SINGH AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO.102, HOSAHALLI NAVAGRAMA THAGGIGUPPE POST MAGADI TALUK

¶16

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT

¶17

Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶18

SHANTHA BAI W/O.HANUMAN SINGH

¶19

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

¶20

R/AT R.R.TOWN, MAGADI TOWN BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT

¶21

…APPELLANTS

¶22

(BY SRI CHANDRASHEKAR C., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

¶23

AND:

¶24

K.B.CHANDRA BAN SINGH

¶25

S/O.LATE BALARAM SINGH

¶26

SINCE DIED REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS.

¶27

CHANDRA BAI W/O.LATE CHANDRABAN SINGH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:7291 RFA No. 74 of 2019

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

NANDINI BAI D/O.LATE CHANDRABAN SINGH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

¶32

KIRAN SINGH S/O.LATE CHANDRABAN SINGH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶33

KIRSHNA SINGH S/O.LATE CHANDRABAN SINGH AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶34

R-1 TO R-4 ARE R/AT NO.14 3^RD CROSS, AZAD NAGAR CHAMARAJPET BENGALURU-560 018

¶35

K.B.RANDHIR SINGH

¶36

SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS.

¶37

SANDHYA BAI W/O.LATE K.B.RANDHIR SINGH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

¶38

KUM.NEHA D/O.LATE K.B.RANDHIR SINGH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS

¶39

KUM.KANNIKA D/O.LATE K.B.RANDHIR SINGH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS

¶40

R-5 TO R-7 ARE R/AT NO.14, 3^RD CROSS AZAD NAGAR, CHAMARAJPET BENGALURU-560 018

¶41

PRABHAVATHI W/O.RATHAN SINGH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT NO.13, II CROSS

¶42

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:7291 RFA No. 74 of 2019

¶43

HC-KAR

¶44

MUNESHWARA LAYOUT KAMAKSHIPALYA BENGALURU-560 079

¶45

SMT.N.SANDHYA BAI W/O.LATE K.B.YUVARAJ SINGH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

¶46

MASTER Y.NARAHARI SINGH S/O.LATE K.B.YUVARAJ SINGH AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶47

MASTER Y.NAGARAJ SINGH S/O.LATE K.B.YUVARAJ SINGH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶48

R-9 TO R-11 ARE R/AT NO.14 3^RD CROSS, AZAD NAGAR CHAMARAJPET BENGALURU-560 018

¶49

…RESPONDENTS

¶50

(BY SRI SADAKATH U., ADVOCATE FOR R-1, R-3, R-4, R-9, R-10 AND R-11; R-2 AND R-7 ARE SERVED; APPEAL AS AGAINST R-5, R-6 & R-8 STANDS DISMISSED V/O DATED 12.09.2024)

¶51

THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC PRAYING TO MODIFY/SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.10.2018 PASSED IN OS.NO.10993/2006 BY XXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU AND ETC.

¶52

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶53

¶54

NC: 2026:KHC:7291 RFA No. 74 of 2019

¶55

HC-KAR

¶56

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

¶57

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶58

This case was listed on 07.11.2024, 19.11.2024 and 20.12.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants.

¶59

This Court, vide order dated 31.01.2026, ordered that the matter to be listed today under the caption 'dismissal' and accordingly, the case is listed today. However, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.

¶60

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶61

In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration.

¶62

SD/(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE

¶63

LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

K B Chandra Bai v. K B Chandra Ban Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K B Chandra Bai v. K B Chandra Ban Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Late Kalaiah Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Sri Channappa Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Smt Gowramma Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Muralidharrao Raghavendrarao Kulkarni Vs Sharadabai Ravajirao Kulkarni

Sri. Balaji Singh Vs Smt. Rashmi P Beliya

Smt. Yellamma Vs Sri. Umesh