Sri Ramdevar Mutt v. Sri Devanayakacharya

Karnataka HC22 Jun 2026RFA/714/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of appeal by memo; appeal dismissed as not pressed; RFA No. 714 of 2020 (INJ); NC: 2026:KHC:30674; Section 96 Order XLI Rule 1 CPC; injunction suit OS.No.1744/2011; XIV Additional City Civil Judge Bengaluru; Sri Ramdevar Mutt Registered Charitable Trust v. Sri Devanayakacharya and Sri Ramadevara Mutt Trust; High Court of Karnataka; decided 22-06-2026.

What did the court decide?

In view of the memo filed by learned counsel for the appellant seeking withdrawal of the appeal, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. ¶34-35

Sri Ramdevar Mutt Vs Sri Devanayakacharya — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:30674 RFA No. 714 of 2020

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No. 714 OF 2020 (INJ)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI RAMDEVAR MUTT REGISTERED CHARITABLE TRUST C A SITE No.1, 1 A CROSS, III STAGE, 4^TH CROSS BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS MAHANT SWAMY RAMANUJACHARYA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O PANDIT UDAYA NARAYANA DIXIT.

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SMT. CHAMPA M, ADVOCATE SRI MADHAUSUDHAN ADIGA B, ADVOCATE SRI B K VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SRI DEVANAYAKACHARYA FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO PLAINTIFF AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS MAHANTH SRI SATHYANARAYANASWAMY TEMPLE TRUST, ITTEKEGUDU NEAR MYSORE ZOO MYSORE-570 010.

¶15

SRI RAMADEVARA MUTT TRUST HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MELUKOTE P.O., PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.

¶16

AND ALSO AT

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:30674 RFA No. 714 of 2020

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

SRI LAKSHMI NARAYANA SWAMY TEMPLE No.01, WEST OF CHORD, 4^TH BLOCK 3^RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARANAGAR BANGALORE-560 079. REPRESENTED BY TRUSTEE SRI O PRATAP KUMAR.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI N KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2)

¶23

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 ORDER XLI RULE RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.10.2019 PASSED IN OS.No.1744/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR INJUNCTION.

¶24

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

¶26

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶27

Learned counsel for the appellant files memo seeking

¶28

withdrawal of the appeal.

¶29