Dismissed¶41

Sri Gopal Nayak v. Sri N.B. Shivashankarachar

Karnataka HC28 Apr 2026RFA/507/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, RFA No. 507 of 2014 (Justices D K Singh and T.M.Nadaf, 28.04.2026): Sec.96 CPC appeal against the 14.2.2014 judgment and decree in O.S.No.210/2007 (Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Doddaballapur; suit decreeing specific performance and declaration) dismissed as withdrawn per appellant's memo dated 28.04.2026; court fee refund ordered; pending interlocutory applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; court fee paid ordered refunded to the appellant as per the relevant Rules; pending interlocutory applications disposed of. ¶41

Sri Gopal Nayak Vs Sri N.B. Shivashankarachar — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:23789-DB RFA No. 507 of 2014

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 28^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

¶8

AND

¶9

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 507 OF 2014

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI GOPAL NAYAK

¶12

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O MUNISHAMI NAYAKa R/AT FRONT OF THE COURT ROJIPURA 4TH WARD, DODDABALLAPURA NAGAR BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561203

¶13

…APPELLANT

¶14

(BY SMT. DIVYA .K, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KRISHNA NAIK., ADVOCATE)

¶15

Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

AND:

¶17

SRI N.B. SHIVASHANKARACHAR AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O LATE BANAPPACHAR

¶18

SRI. N.S. BALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O N.B. SHIVASHANKARACHAR

¶19

SRI. N.B. CHIDAMBARACHAR, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O LATE BANAPPACHAR,

¶20

SRI. N.C. MAHESH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O N.B. CHIDAMBARACHAR,

¶21

¶22

NC: 2026:KHC:23789-DB RFA No. 507 of 2014

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

R1 TO R4 ALL ARE R/AT NO.127, SHIVASHRUTHI, YELLAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, NAGAVARAPALYA, SRI.C.V.R. RAMAN POST, BANGALORE-560 093

¶25

SRI.M. HARISH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, S/O M.MUNI REDDY R/AT ADDEVISHWANATHAPURA VILLAGE BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-561203

¶26

…RESPONDENTS (VIDE ORDER DATED 13.04.2016, NOTICE TO R1 & R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT; R3 AND R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; SRI. H.V.SUBRAMANYA, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

¶27

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.2.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.210/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODDABALLAPUR, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND DECLARATION.

¶28

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH

¶30

and

¶31

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

¶32

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶33

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

¶34

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo

¶35

dated 28.04.2026 praying to dismiss the present regular

¶36

first appeal as withdrawn.

¶37

¶38

NC: 2026:KHC:23789-DB RFA No. 507 of 2014

¶39

HC-KAR

¶40

Memo is placed and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶41

At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, since the matter is settled between the parties, the Court Fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant as per the relevant Rules.

¶42

In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending

¶43

interlocutory applications, if any do not survive for consideration, hence stand disposed of.

¶44

Sd/(D K SINGH) JUDGE

¶45

Sd/(T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

¶46

NG CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12

Sri Gopal Nayak v. Sri N.B. Shivashankarachar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Gopal Nayak v. Sri N.B. Shivashankarachar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Bengaluru Water Supply and Sewerage Board Vs Sri. G v Ramesh

The President Vs Smt Chanchal Bai

M/S. Sobha Limited Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Lakshmidevamma Vs Rajathurai

Sri. Omkaramurthy. T. G. Vs M/S. Biesse Manufacturing Company Ltd.

Sri Sangaraju Vs Smt Leela