Shri S Chandrakar v. Shri R Margabhandhu
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against dismissal of a suit for declaration and permanent injunction. With the sole appellant having died and no legal representatives brought on record despite time granted, the appeal stood abated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 - NC: 2026:KHC:10720 RFA No. 432 of 2012
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 432 OF 2012 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. S. CHANDRAKAR S/O LATE K. SHESHANANDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.37/13, CHURCH CROSS, OLD MADIVALA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 068.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRAKASH T. HEBBAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Chandrakar
- respondent
R. Margabhandhu
- respondent
A. Radhamma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/432/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court