Smt Hanumakka @ Pillamma v. Smt Prema
Case brief
What is this about?
Withdrawal of appeal; RFA under S.96 CPC against rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC (OS No.649/2024, XLI Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru; judgment and decree dated 15.06.2024); dismissed as withdrawn on memo before adjudication. High Court of Karnataka, Hanchate Sanjeevkumar J., 16-07-2026; CNR KAHC010081022025; NC 2026:KHC:36724. Appellants: Hanumakka @ Pillamma, S.N.Chandrashekar, Devika, Sudarshan Babu S.N., Parvathamma, Gayathri S.V., Srikanth (counsel Naik N.R.). Respondents: Prema, Renuka, Vijaya Lakshmi, Lakshmi, Lakshman Murthy, Prabhakar, Munichowdappa, S.R.Muniyappa, Jayanthi, S.V.Tilakraj (S. Venugopala for R10 & R11; R1, R2, R7, R8 & R9 served).
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to the memo filed by learned counsel for the appellants; no question on the merits was adjudicated.