Dismissed¶¶32

Sri Muniraju N R v. Smt Narasamma

Karnataka HC6 Jan 2026RFA/2937/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; RFA No. 2937 of 2025 (SP) dismissed as not maintainable on pecuniary jurisdiction — suit valued Rs.7,50,000/-; Section 96 CPC appeal against trial court order dated 08.07.2025 allowing I.A. No.III under Order VII Rule 11(d) r/w Section 151 CPC in O.S. No.1/2021 (Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Tumakuru); liberty reserved to appellant to appeal before District Court; Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum, 06-01-2026.

What did the court decide?

Office objection regarding maintainability of the appeal is upheld: the suit having been valued at Rs.7,50,000/- for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction, the appeal is not maintainable before this Court. ¶¶29-¶31

Sri Muniraju N R Vs Smt Narasamma — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:581 RFA No. 2937 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2937 OF 2025 (SP)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. MUNIRAJU .N.R S/O LATE RAJANNA .G AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.320 NELAGADARANAHALLI YESWANTHAPURA HOBALI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560073.

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI. KRISHNAPPA .M.N, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SMT. NARASAMMA W/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

¶15

SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA S/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

¶16

SRI. SHEKAR S/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

¶17

SRI. JAYANNA S/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:581 RFA No. 2937 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

SMT. SOWMYA D/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

¶22

ALL ARE RESIDING AT SHETTIHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBALI TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU (M) 99021 19488 (M) 99010 38120 (M) 90661 94571

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08.07.2025 PASSED ON I.A NO.III IN OS NO.1/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU, ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.III FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC.

¶25

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

¶27

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶28

Office has raised objection regarding maintainability

¶29

of the appeal. The suit was valued at Rs.7,50,000/- for

¶30

the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction. Therefore, appeal is