Smt. B. M. Sowbhagya v. Smt. Munivenkatamma
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, decision dated 19.06.2026; RFA No. 287 of 2021 (PAR/POS); Coram: Justice Hanchate Sanjeevkumar (oral judgment); dismissal for default under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC due to appellant's continuous absence; appeal under Section 96 CPC, 1908 against judgment and decree dated 30.11.2020 in OS.No.8792/2012, LXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru; appellant Smt. B. M. Sowbhagya (Counsel Masur Ravindra Krishnarao); respondents Smt. Munivenkatamma (Halesh R G), Sri. Gururaj (served, unrepresented), Smt. Girija B M and Smt. Padmavathi (A. Ramanjanappa). No cases cited, no quantum, no substantive holdings.
What did the court decide?
As the order sheet discloses that the appellant is continuously absent, the appeal is dismissed for default as per Order XLI Rule 17 of CPC. No substantive issue was argued or decided.