Appellant filed a memo to withdraw his regular first appeal against a partly decreed ejectment suit; appeal was dismissed as withdrawn and court fee refund application was allowed based on the cited Supreme Court judgment.
Entire court fee refunded per office directive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2480 OF 2025 (RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI V. ANANDA S/O. VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OFFICE AT NO.18, S-3, 2ND FLOOR 11TH CROSS, CUBBONPET NEAR BANAPPA PARK BENGALURU -560 002
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI V. ANANDA, (PARTY-IN-PERSON))
AND:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. SACHI AGARWAL W/O. ASHISH AGARWAL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OFFICE AT NO.18, 11TH CROSS CUBBONPET, NEAR BANAPPA PARK BENGALURU-560 002
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI SANTHOSH KUMAR G., ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.08.2025 PASSED IN O.S.NO.5774/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, C/C LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, (CCH-60) PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2026:KHC:14805 RFA No. 2480 of 2025
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 12.03.2026 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal.
withdrawn .
M.C.Subramaniam - AIR 2021 SC 2662 , the application is
allowed and the office is directed to refund the entire Court fee in accordance with law.
Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
BKN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. M.C.SubramaniamApplied
AIR 2021 SC 2662 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI V. ANANDA S/O. VENKATAPPA
SMT. SACHI AGARWAL W/O. ASHISH AGARWAL
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
