Smt. Vatsala v. Sri. Sridhar R

Karnataka HC5 Jun 2026RFA/2407/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RFA No. 2407 of 2025 (PAR), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (DB), decided 05.06.2026 - Vatsala R. v. Sridhar R and Latha R. Appeal under S.96 CPC against judgment and decree dated 02.07.2025 in FDP No.162/2023 (I Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru) allowing a suit for partition. Dismissed as withdrawn on the appellant's memo citing negotiated settlement with respondents regarding suit schedule property. Notice to respondent 1 had been dispensed with vide office note dated 27.01.2026; no cases or precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Appellant permitted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to the memo recording a negotiated settlement with the respondents regarding the suit schedule property. ¶39-40

Smt. Vatsala Vs Sri. Sridhar R — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:26741-DB RFA No. 2407 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶8

AND

¶9

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶10

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2407 OF 2025 (PAR)

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

SMT. VATSALA R. D/O. LATE P.V.RAMCHANDRAN, AGED 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.557, OPP. SARJAPUR ROAD, KPC LAYOUT, KASAVANAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 035.

¶13

Digitally signed by RAKSHA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

(BY SRI. B. S. RAGHU PRASAD, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

SRI. SRIDHAR R

¶17

…APPELLANT

¶18

S/O. LATE P.V.RAMACHANDRAN, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.213, 5^TH MAIN, BANASHANKARI 5^TH STAGE, BENGALURU-560 061.

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:26741-DB RFA No. 2407 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

SMT. LATHA R,

¶23

D/O. LATE P.V.RAMACHANDRAN,

¶24

AGED 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.10, 3^RD CROSS, 6^TH CROSS AGS LAYOUT BANASHANKRI BENGALURU

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI. AJIT KALYAN, ADV. FOR R2;

¶27

V/C/O DTD:27.01.2026 NOTICE TO R1 IS DESPENSED WITH)

¶28

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.07.2025 PASSED IN FDP NO.162/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.

¶29

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶30

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶31

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:26741-DB RFA No. 2407 of 2025

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶35

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶36

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks

¶37

leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal and has filed a memo to that effect. The memo reads as under;

¶38

"The undersigned Appellant of the above case prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit her to withdraw the above appeal as she has negotiated and settled with the respondents to deal with the suit schedule property in the interest of justice and equity."

¶39

In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as

¶40

withdrawn.

¶41

Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶42

Sd/(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE

¶43

RAK,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Smt. Vatsala v. Sri. Sridhar R

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Vatsala v. Sri. Sridhar R

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri B S Praveen Kumar Vs Kumar Naik

Smt. Lakshmamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Mrs Carobina Ferrao Gurien Vs Mrs Dephny Gladys Lobo

Sri. R. Eshan Vs Sri. a. Shashidhara

Sri. Lokesh Kumar Gahlot Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Ramya Anilshet @ Nagashree. R Vs the State of Karnataka