Dismissed¶40

Albert Deepak v. Smt Sharni Joseph Rufena

Karnataka HC22 Apr 2026RFA/2263/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; RFA No. 2263 of 2023; decided 22.04.2026; coram Anu Sivaraman and Tara Vitasta Ganju JJ. (per Anu Sivaraman J.). Appellants: Albert Deepak, Maria Deepa Abel, Urasala Rajan, Oasis Technologies India (alleged partnership firm), Oasis Websolutions India Pvt. Ltd., and Fathima Susainathan (counsel: Sailesh S Katarey); Respondent: Sharni Joseph Rufena. Appeal under Section 96 r/w Order 41 Rule 1 CPC against judgment and decree dated 21.02.2023 in OS No.3439/2018 (X Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, CCH-26). Dismissed as withdrawn on appellants' memo; no merits issues decided; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the appeal accepted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn. ¶40

Albert Deepak Vs Smt Sharni Joseph Rufena — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:21813-DB RFA No. 2263 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶8

AND

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶10

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2263 OF 2023

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

ALBERT DEEPAK S/O RAJAN AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

¶13

SMT. MARIA DEEPA ABEL W/O ALBERT DEEPAK AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

¶14

Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

¶15

SMT. URASALA RAJAN W/O RAJAN AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

¶16

ALL AT NO.27, 2^ND CROSS, RAYAPPA ROAD KAMMANAHALLI BANGALORE – 560 084

¶17

OASIS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA AN ALLEGED PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS, ALBERT DEPAK & MARIA DEEPA ABEL NO.629, 1^ST MAIN, DOMLUR BANGALORE – 560 071

¶18

OASIS WEBSOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:21813-DB RFA No. 2263 of 2023

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

A DULY REGISTERED COMPANY NO.629, 1^ST MAIN, DOMLUR BANGALORE – 560 071

¶22

SMT. FATHIMA SUSAINATHAN W/O MR. JAISON AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.40, LAXMI NILAYA, 2^ND CROSS, SUTHAMA MAIN ROAD R S PALYA, KAMMANAHALLI BANGALORE – 560 033

¶23

…APPELLANTS

¶24

(BY SRI. SAILESH S KATAREY., ADVOCATE)

¶25

AND:

¶26

SMT. SHARNI JOSEPH RUFENA W/O JOSEPH PRASANNA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO.188, KARIYANAPALYA 3^RD CROSS, RAMACHANDRAPPA LAYOUT ST. THOMAS TOWN PO BANGALORE – 560 084

¶27

…RESPONDENT

¶28

THIS RFA IA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE IN OS NO.3439/2018 DATED 21.02.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE X ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-26) IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

¶29

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶30

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶31

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:21813-DB RFA No. 2263 of 2023

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶35