Dismissed¶46

Mr. Krishna Kumar M J v. Mrs. Sakamma

Karnataka HC8 Apr 2026RFA/1929/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RFA No. 1929 of 2022, High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, decided 08-04-2026; appeal under S.96 r/w O.41 R.1 CPC against partial decree dated 23.06.2022 in OS No.1658/2015 (suit for declaration and permanent injunction, XV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru); dismissed as withdrawn on memo signed by all appellants; refund of eligible Court fee to appellant No.1 ordered electronically; no merits adjudication, no issues framed, no precedents cited; bench: Anu Sivaraman and Tara Vitasta Ganju JJ.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn on the memo filed by counsel for the appellants bearing signatures of all appellants; eligible Court fee directed to be refunded to appellant No.1 electronically. ¶46

Mr. Krishna Kumar M J Vs Mrs. Sakamma — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:19438-DB RFA No. 1929 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶8

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1929 OF 2022

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

MR. KRISHNA KUMAR.M.J. S/O MR. M.N.JAGANNATHA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.103, SIRI RAM PARADISE, VADDARAPALYA,

¶11

UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 061.

¶12

MRS. GEETHA KRISHNAMURTHY D/O MR.ESHWAR BHAT, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.202, SIRI RAM PARADISE, VADDARAPALYA

¶13

UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 061.

¶14

Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA

¶15

MR. GIRIRAJA.B.P S/O MR. B.S.PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.102, SIRI RAM PARADISE, VADDARAPALYA, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 061.

¶16

MR. B.N.KESHAVAMURTHY S/O MR. B.S.NARANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.402,

¶17

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:19438-DB RFA No. 1929 of 2022

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

SIRI RAM PARADISE, VADDARAPALYA, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 061.

¶20

MR. DRONAMRAJU SRIDEVI S/O MR RAMA TURANGA, DRONAMRAJU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.303, SIRI RAM PARADISE, VADDARAPALYA, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 061.

¶21

MRS. P.B.SUDHA W/O MR. N.VIJAYANARASIMHA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

¶22

MR. N.VIJAYANARASIMHA S/O MR. NARASIMHAMURTHY.N, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,

¶23

APPELLANTS NO.6 & 7 ARE RESIDING AT: FLAT NO. 101, SIRI RAM PARADISE, VADDARAPALYA, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 061.

¶24

…APPELLANTS

¶25

(BY SRI. NISHANTH.A.V., ADVOCATE)

¶26

AND:

¶27

MRS. SAKAMMA W/O LATE MR. MUTHURAJ, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

¶28

MRS. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

¶29

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:19438-DB RFA No. 1929 of 2022

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

MRS. LALITHAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA. AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

¶32

RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.90/2, 1^ST CROSS, KAVERI ROAD, VADDARAPALYA, AREHALLI, SUBRAMANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU-560 061.

¶33

MR. SUNDARE GOWDA S/O LATE BORAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.44, 5^TH CROSS, HANUMANTHANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 019.

¶34

MR. BALASUBRAMANYA S/O LATE SHIVASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.152, ‘PARVATHI NIVASA’, 6^TH MAIN ROAD, 4^TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 011.

¶35

…RESPONDENTS

¶36

(BY SRI. S.KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. R.D.PANCHAM., ADVOCATE FOR R5)

¶37

THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.06.2022 PASSED IN OS No.1658/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.

¶38

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶39

¶40

NC: 2026:KHC:19438-DB RFA No. 1929 of 2022

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶43

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶44

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶45

Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal with signatures of all the appellants, has been placed on record. It is submitted that the eligible Court fee may be refunded to the appellant No.1, electronically.

¶46

Having considered the contentions advanced and having perused the memo seeking withdrawal, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn . The eligible Court fee may be refunded to the appellant No.1, electronically.

¶47

Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE

¶48

Sd/(TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE

¶49

¶50

List No.: 3 Sl No.: 14

Mr. Krishna Kumar M J v. Mrs. Sakamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Krishna Kumar M J v. Mrs. Sakamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Fan Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mrs. Shashikala Balaji

Sri L Vivekananda Vs M/S Handy 101 Solutions and Service Pvt. Ltd.

Smt. Dr. Mahima K B Vs the State of Karnataka

Angelo R Constantino Vs Nil

Smt Vanajakshi Vs S Mahesh

Sri Revanna Vs Smt Thayamma