Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, RFA No. 1913 of 2018 (SP), decided 15.06.2026 by M.I.ARUN, J. Regular First Appeal by Mohammed Rizwan (Appellant No.1; appeal against Appellant No.2 Shahistha deleted on 15.06.2026) against the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2018 of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Davanagere, in O.S.No.66/2017, which decreed specific performance of a sale agreement in favour of respondent Mohammed Pasha. Appeal disposed by compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC: Appellant No.1 paid Rs.15,00,000 to the respondent, who relinquished all right, title and interest in the suit schedule property. Appeal allowed; O.S.No.66/2017 dismissed; decree to be drawn; Court fee refunded to Appellant No.1. No precedents cited or discussed; compromise disposal.
What did the court decide?
Appeal allowed in terms of the memorandum of compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC; O.S.No.66/2017 dismissed; Registry to draw a decree accordingly and to refund the Court fee to Appellant No.1 in accordance with law.