Dismissed¶¶35

M/S Uniq Detective and Security Services Private Limited v. Sri C Balakrishna

Karnataka HC8 Jun 2026RFA/1908/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; RFA No. 1908 of 2024 (DEC/INJ); NC: 2026:KHC:27567; appeal under Section 96 CPC against decree dated 29.06.2024 in O.S. No.6190/2020 (declaration and injunction) by XV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru; dismissed as infructuous following out-of-court settlement memo; parties: Uniq Detective and Security Services Private Limited v. C Balakrishna and Bosch Limited; no adjudication on merits; single judge Hanchate Sanjeevkumar; decided 08.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous, the matter having been settled out of court. ¶¶34

M/S Uniq Detective and Security Services Private Limited Vs Sri C Balakrishna — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27567 RFA No. 1908 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1908 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

M/S UNIQ DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

¶9

NO.81/A, 2ND CROSS, GKW LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU-560 040. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED PERSON MR. ALOYSIUS MASCARENHAS

¶10

THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HUMAN RESOURCES)

¶11

M/S UNIQ DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,

¶12

Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

NO.81/A, 2ND CROSS, GKW LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040

¶14

…APPELLANTS

¶15

(BY SRI. PRASHANTH B.K..,ADVOCATE)

¶16

AND:

¶17

SRI C BALAKRISHNA S/O LATE CHINARAJU.,

¶18

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:27567 RFA No. 1908 of 2024

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.280/1, NEW MICO-CENTRAL JAIL ROAD, G.K.LAYOUT, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA, BANGALORE - 560 100.

¶21

M/S. BOSCH LIMITED, NAGANATHAPURA PLANT POST BOX NO.6887 ELECTRONICS CIY POST, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER(HR)

¶22

…RESPONDENT

¶23

(BY SRI. MAITREYI KRISHNAN.,ADVOCATE;

¶24

SRI. J. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶25

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.06.2024 PASSED IN OS.NO.6190/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION.

¶26

THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:27567 RFA No. 1908 of 2024

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶32

Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed a memo stating that the matter is settled. Hence, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no objection to

¶33

dismiss the appeal as having become infructuous.

¶34

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as having become

¶35

infructuous as it is settled out of the court.

¶36

Sd/(HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE

¶37

¶38

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48