Disposed¶38

Smt. Chinnamani @ Chennamma v. Sri.Shivanaiah

Karnataka HC17 Feb 2026RFA/185/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Abatement of appeal; death of sole appellant; memo accepted; partition and separate possession suit dismissed; O.S.No.361/2012; III Addl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM Mysuru; RFA No. 185 of 2016; Section 96 CPC; Order XLI CPC; Karnataka High Court; Special Land Acquisition Officer MUDA; death on 16.04.2024; memo dated 15.11.2025; pending I.As disposed.

What did the court decide?

Appeal abated consequent to the death of the sole appellant; pending I.As, if any, disposed of. ¶38

Smt. Chinnamani @ Chennamma Vs Sri.Shivanaiah — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:9701-DB RFA No. 185 of 2016

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

¶8

AND

¶9

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

¶10

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 185 OF 2016 (PAR)

¶11

BETWEEN:

¶12

SMT. CHINNAMANI @ CHENNAMMA D/O KEMPAIAH, W/O LATE SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/A MOOSAMBAYANAHALLI VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK - 570 010.

¶13

…APPELLANT

¶14

(BY SRI.Y.K.NARAYANA SHARMA., ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

Digitally Signed by REKHA R Location : High Court of Karnataka

¶17

SRI.SHIVANAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS (SINCE DEAD, REPRESENTED BY LRS R2 TO 7)

¶18

SRI UCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O SRI SHIVANAIAH.

¶19

SRI KULLAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O SRI SHIVANAIAH.

¶20

SRI SHIVRAJ AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O SRI SHIVANAIAH.

¶21

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:9701-DB RFA No. 185 of 2016

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

SRI SWAMY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O SRI SHIVANAIAH.

¶24

SMT KEMPAMANI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, D/O SRI SHIVANAIAH.

¶25

SMT MANJULA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O SRI SHIVANAIAH.

¶26

R2 TO 6 ARE R/A LALITHADRIPURAM VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 010.

¶27

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MYSURU - 570 001

¶28

…RESPONDENTS

¶29

(BY SRI. P SRINIVASAIAH., ADVOCATE FOR R2-7; SRI.T.P.VIVEKANANDA., ADVOCATE FOR R8; V/O/D: 25.03.2018, R2 TO 7 ARE LRS OF DECEASED R8)

¶30

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 READ WITH ORDER

¶31

XLI RULE OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 09.10.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.361/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION & SEPARTE POSSESSION.

¶32

THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

¶33

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:9701-DB RFA No. 185 of 2016

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶36

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

¶37

A memo has been filed by counsel for respondent No.1 on 15.11.2025 stating that the sole appellant Smt.Chinnammanni who was the plaintiff in O.S.No.960/2005 died on 16.04.2024 and that the appeal stands abated.

¶38

The memo is accepted and the appeal stands abated .

¶39

In view of the abatement of the appeal, pending I.As, if any, stand disposed of.

¶40

Sd/(JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE

¶41

Sd/(T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

¶42

TKN

¶43

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26.1

Smt. Chinnamani @ Chennamma v. Sri.Shivanaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Chinnamani @ Chennamma v. Sri.Shivanaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. v. Jayashree Vs Sri. Lokesh v

Venkatesh Vs Swetha

Smt Shanthala B M Vs B R Avinash Babu

Atreya Ayurvedic Medical College Hospital and Research Centre Vs Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences

Smt. v. S. Seema Vs Sri. H. C. Theerthesh

Sri B P Yashavantha Kumar Vs Smt M N Manjula @ Manjamma