Dismissed¶¶45

Sri P S Ramesh v. Sri G T Gopalakrishnamachar

Karnataka HC9 Jun 2026RFA/1829/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; appellants' counsel (Sri. Abhinav R.) absent when matter called out twice; RFA under S.96 r/w Order XLI Rule 1 CPC against decree dated 28.8.2013 in O.S.No.100/2010 (XXXVIII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore, CCH-39); impleading order dated 29.04.2015 for proposed Respondents 9-11 and sufficiency of notice to Respondents 1-3 noted; no merits adjudicated, no cases cited, no quantum; minimal citation value on substance.

What did the court decide?

Despite the matter being called out twice, no one appeared for the appellants. ¶¶44

Sri P S Ramesh Vs Sri G T Gopalakrishnamachar — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27500-DB RFA No. 1829 of 2013

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

¶8

AND

¶9

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1829 OF 2013 (DEC)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

SRI. P. S. RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O P. S. SRINIVASAN,

¶12

SMT. P. S. POORNIMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS D/O P. S. SRINIVASAN AND W/O SRIDHAR NARAYAN

¶13

Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA

¶14

THE APPELLANTS 1 & 2 ARE R/AT NO.5, NANJAPPA ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 027

¶15

…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

¶16

AND:

¶17

SRI. G. T. GOPALAKRISHNAMACHAR AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS S/O LATE GADADHARA THIRUMALACHAR

¶18

SMT. G. G. HARINI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS D/O G. T. GOPALAKRISHNAMACHAR

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:27500-DB RFA No. 1829 of 2013

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

SMT. G. G. BHARGAVI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS D/O G. T. GOPALAKRISHNAMACHAR

¶23

THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO.5/2 & 3 KOTHANURU VILLAGE UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK – 560 077

¶24

SRI. N. J. RAJAGOPALAN AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O LATE SRI. JANARDHANACHARYA R/O NUGGEHALLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 116

¶25

SRI. PRATEEK K KUMAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O PRAFUL KUMAR R/AT ROW HOUSE NO.1 GOLD FIELD ENCLAVE SOCIETY KOREGAN PARK PUNE – 411 001

¶26

SRI. G. V. RAMASESHAN AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE VENKATACHAR R/AT NO.1/1 (OLD NO.10/109) SURABHI, 3^RD A CROSS SRINIVAS NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 085

¶27

SRI. ANANTHASHAYANAM AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE VENKATACHAR R/AT NO.79, 2^ND MAIN ROAD JAYALAKSHMIPURAM MYSORE – 570 012

¶28

SRI. THIRUMALACHAR G V AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:27500-DB RFA No. 1829 of 2013

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

S/O LATE VENKATACHAR R/AT VENKATAIHNA CHATHRA CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK CHAMARAJANAGARA DISRTICT – 571 313

¶33

…RESPONDENTS

¶34

(BY SRI. PAVAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. N.BYREGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. HARSHA D JOSHI, ADVOCATE FOR R6 TO R8; SRI. SANTOSH S GOGI, ADVOCATE FOR PROPOSED R9 TO R11, VIDE ORDER DATED 29.04.2015,

¶35

NOTICE TO R1 TO R3 ARE HELD SUFFICIENT)

¶36

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.8.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.100/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BANGALORE (CCH-39) AND CONSEQUENT UPON THE SAME DECREE THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFFS WITH COST AND TO PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO PASS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶37

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶38

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶39

¶40

NC: 2026:KHC:27500-DB RFA No. 1829 of 2013

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶43