Mr. Abdul Bari v. Mrs. Noorjan
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC, R. Nataraj J., 24.04.2026: RFA No.1675/2023 (PAR) by Abdul Bari DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION - no representation by appellant's counsel Smt. Swathi Ashok on hearing date and on last date; appeal called twice. Challenge to judgment and decree dated 22.05.2023 in OS No.25171/2016 (XIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru) partly decreeing suit for partition and separate possession; filed under S.96 r/w Order XLI Rule 1 CPC. Caveat by Respondent No.1 (Noorjan); Mehter M Azzam for R.1-19, 21-43; M.K. Metri for R.45-48; POA holders Noorjan, Gaffar M, Rehana Begum, Mohammed Khasim Naushad; R.20(a)/(b) served and unrepresented; service on R.44 (Nayeem Pasha) dispensed with vide order dated 18.03.2025. No merits decided; no cases or monetary reliefs recorded.
What did the court decide?
Since there was no representation for the appellant on the date of hearing and even on the last date, although the appeal was called twice in the day, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.