Dismissed¶50

Chikkananjamma v. Sri Nanjaiah

Karnataka HC15 Jun 2026RFA/1526/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, RFA No. 1526 of 2022 (Chikkananjamma & Anr. v. Nanjaiah & Ors.), decided 15.06.2026 by Hanchate Sanjeevkumar J. Appeal under Section 96 CPC against dismissal (decree dated 20.02.2020) of partition suit OS.No.87/2014 by the Additional Court of Small Causes and Senior Civil Judge, Mysuru. Dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants failed to take steps for notice issued on 02.01.2024. No merits adjudication, no precedent on partition law, no costs or quantum.

What did the court decide?

Despite notice issued by this Court on 02.01.2024, the appellants have not taken any steps for issuing notice to the respondents. ¶50

Chikkananjamma Vs Sri Nanjaiah — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:29392 RFA No. 1526 of 2022

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

¶6

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1526 OF 2022 (PAR)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

CHIKKANANJAMMA

¶9

W/O MAYANNA

¶10

D/O LATE GORAKALE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT DADADAHALLI JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK - 570 004.

¶11

SMT. NANJAMMA

¶12

Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

W/O BEERAIAH D/O LATE GORAKALE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.87, I CROSS, RAMA MANDIRA ROAD, T.K. LAYOUT,

¶14

MYSURU - 570 014.

¶15

(BY SRI. KUMARA K.G, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶16

…APPELLANTS

¶17

AND:

¶18

SRI. NANJAIAH S/O LATE GORAKALE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

¶19

SRI JAVARA S/O LATE GORAKALE GOWDA DEAD BY LRS

¶20

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:29392 RFA No. 1526 of 2022

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

2(A). KALAMMA W/O LATE JAVARA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

¶23

2(B). LAKSHMI D/O LATE JAVARA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶24

2(C). RAVI S/O LATE JAVARA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶25

2(D). MALATHI D/O LATE JAVARA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶26

2(E). MINOR SUNITHA D/O LATE JAVARA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

¶27

SRI. SHIVANANJA @ SHIVANANJAIAH S/O LATE GORAKALE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

¶28

SMT NANJAMMA W/O NANJEGOWDA @ DODDAGUNDU GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

¶29

SMT.SIDDAMMA W/O NANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

¶30

SMT. HOOVAMMA W/O NANJAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

¶31

SRI MAHADEVA S/O RAME GOWDA @ ELE KOOSAIAH DEAD BY LRS

¶32

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:29392 RFA No. 1526 of 2022

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

7(A). SMT. LAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D/O MAHADEVA W/O LATE RAVI

¶35

7(B). SRI CHANDRA S/O LATE MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

¶36

7(C). SRI. BEERAPPA S/O LATE MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶37

7(D). SMT. SHANTHI D/O LATE MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶38

7(E). SRI. NAGENDRA S/O LATE MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

¶39

SMT. CHIKKAJAVARAMMA W/O BEEREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

¶40

SMT. BASAMMA W/O ERAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS ALL THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT DADADAHALLI VILLAGE JAYAPURA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK - 570 004.

¶41

SRI. VEERESH S/O R.S. RAJASHEKARA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS NO.50, "SRIGANDHA", 1ST MAIN, A BLOCK, J.P. NAGAR, MYSURU - 570 015.

¶42

…RESPONDENTS

¶43

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:29392 RFA No. 1526 of 2022

¶44

HC-KAR

¶45

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.02.2020 PASSED IN OS.NO.87/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE, ADDITIONAL COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, AND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT MYSURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.

¶46

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶47

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

¶48

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶49

The appeal is of the year 2022.

¶50

On 02.01.2024, this Court had issued notice to the respondents, but till today the appellants have not taken any steps for issuing notice to the respondents. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶51

Sd/(HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE

¶52

rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

Chikkananjamma v. Sri Nanjaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chikkananjamma v. Sri Nanjaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri K Mahesh Vs Smt B S Nagarathna

M/S Ikl Bearing India Private Limited Vs M/S Industrial Kinetic Lab India Private Limited

M/S Mi Marbo Italia Vs M/S M Marble Italia

Sri. H. B. Gopal Vs Smt. Swarnalatha. P

M/S Patel Industrial Corporation Vs Sri C Purushotham

Smt N R Renumala Vs Sri M Dharmashekar