Dismissed¶37

Smt Shashi Andrews v. Sri Nitish Raghunath Shetty

Karnataka HC29 Jun 2026RFA/1236/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of appeal; out-of-court settlement; memo for withdrawal accepted; RFA dismissed as withdrawn; pending interlocutory applications disposed; High Court of Karnataka, RFA No. 1236 of 2025 (SP), decided 29-06-2026, bench Anu Sivaraman and Venkatesh Naik T; underlying decree: Original Suit No. 1413 of 2024, X Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-26), judgment and decree dated 13-2-2025; appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1 read with Section 96 CPC; no merits adjudicated; no quantum awarded.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn upon acceptance of the memo for withdrawal; no relief awarded against the impugned judgment and decree, and all pending interlocutory applications disposed of. ¶37

Smt Shashi Andrews Vs Sri Nitish Raghunath Shetty — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:32382-DB RFA No. 1236 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1236 OF 2025 (SP)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT. SHASHI ANDREWS W/O. SRI JOSEPHAT ANDREWS AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.

¶11

SRI JOSHIL ANDREWS S/O. SRI JOSEPHAT ANDREWS AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

¶12

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT FLAT NO.502, 5TH FLOOR ATRIUM HEIGHTS, NO.18 10TH MAIN, PRASHANTHI NAGAR ISRO LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 111.

¶13

Digitally signed by RAKSHA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

(BY SRI S.R. MURALIDHAR, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

…APPELLANTS

¶17

SRI NITISH RAGHUNATH SHETTY S/O. LATE RAGHUNATH NO.206, ROYAL RESIDENCY 5TH CROSS, 4TH STAGE BTM LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 078.

¶18

…RESPONDENT

¶19

(BY SRI M.J. ALVA, ADVOCATE)

¶20

¶21

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL

¶22

¶23

NC: 2026:KHC:32382-DB RFA No. 1236 of 2025

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE X ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-26) IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.1413 OF 2024 DATED 13-2-2025 BY ALLOWING THE PRESENT APPEAL AS PRAYED FOR IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶26

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)

¶30

Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo

¶31

seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that dispute

¶32

has been settled out of the Court.

¶33

The memo reads as follows:

¶34

MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶35

"The undersigned counsel for the appellants herein respectfully prays that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to permit the appellants to withdraw the said appeal pending before this Hon'ble High court, as the appellants have no interest and claim to proceed with the matter. Further this Hon'ble court may be pleased to pass an order permitting to withdraw the appeal in the interest of justice and equity."

¶36

Accordingly, the memo is accepted. The appeal is

¶37

dismissed as withdrawn .

¶38

¶39

NC: 2026:KHC:32382-DB RFA No. 1236 of 2025

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

All pending interlocutory applications shall stand disposed

¶42