Dismissed¶¶47

Smt Muniyamma v. Late Smt Jayamma

Karnataka HC10 Jul 2026RFA/1165/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru (NC: 2026:KHC:35010) — RFA No.1165 of 2026 (MOR), Smt. Muniyamma and others v. Jayamma and others; appeal under Sections 96(2), 97 and 151 CPC against decree dated 29.07.2010 in OS No.249/2009, Principal Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) and JMFC, Sidlaghatta; cause title references FDP 19/2014; disposed by dismissal as withdrawal on the memo of appellants' counsel (Sri. Mallikarjuna Naidu K.); single bench of Hanchate Sanjeevkumar, J.; decided 10-07-2026; two appellants (Ranappa; Sri. Murali) noted in the cause title as fictitiously created persons.

What did the court decide?

Memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal placed on record; appeal dismissed as withdrawn (the words 'as withdrawn' appear in ¶48 immediately following the quoted text). ¶¶47

Smt Muniyamma Vs Late Smt Jayamma — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:35010 RFA No. 1165 of 2026

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1165 OF 2026 (MOR)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS,

¶8

SRI.V. MUNIYAPPA, S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,

¶9

RANAPPA, (NO PERSON IN REAL CREATED FICTITIOUSLY FOR CASE PURPOSE)

¶10

Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA, W/O LATE RANGAPPA, D/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

¶12

SRI. B.R.SHIVAPPA, S/O LATE RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, (IN FDP 19/2014)

¶13

SMT. B.R.MUNIRATHNAMMA, D/O LATE RANGAPPA, W/O LATE NAGARAJU,

¶14

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:35010 RFA No. 1165 of 2026

¶15

HC-KAR

¶16

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS (IN FDP 19/2014)

¶17

SMT. VARALAKSHMAMMA, D/O LATE RANGAPPA, W/O POOJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT CHEEMANGALA VILLAGE, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHICKBALLAPURA DIST - 562 105.

¶18

SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA, W/O SRINIVASAMURTHY, D/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

¶19

SRI. MURALI S/O LATE RANGAPPA, AGE: NOT KNOWN (NO PERSON IN REAL CREATED FICTITIOUSLY FOR CASE PURPOSE)

¶20

SL.NO.2,3,4,5, 6 & 8 ARE RESIDING AT BASAVAPATNA VILLAGE, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 105.

¶21

…APPELLANTS

¶22

(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNA NAIDU K., ADVOCATE)

¶23

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:35010 RFA No. 1165 of 2026

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

AND:

¶26

LATE SMT. JAYAMMA, W/O LATE B.K.NARASIMHAIAH, PRESENT AGE 62 YEARS,

¶27

SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA, D/O LATE B.K.NARASIMHAIAH, AND JAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

¶28

SRI. SRIRAM, S/O LATE B.K.NARASIMHAIAH, AND JAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

¶29

SMT. MUNINARASAMMA, D/O LATE B.K.NARASIMHAIAH, AND CHIKKAMUNIYAMMA, W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

¶30

SRI. MUNIRAJU, S/O LATE B.K.NARASIMHAIAH, AND CHIKKAMUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

¶31

SRI. NARASIMHAMURTHY, S/O LATE B.K.NARASIMHAIAH, AND CHIKKAMUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

¶32

SRI. RAMESH, S/O LATE B.K.NARASIMHAIAH AND CHIKKAMUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

¶33

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:35010 RFA No. 1165 of 2026

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

(THIS RESPONDENT NO.7 PRESENTLY PRACTICING AS AN ADVOCATE IN BENGALURU)

¶36

ALL THE ABOVE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 7 PERMANENTLY RESIDENTS OF BASAVAPATNA VILLAGE, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHICKBALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 105.

¶37

…RESPONDENTS

¶38

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96(2), 97, READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED.29.07.2010 PASSED IN OS NO.249/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN.) AND JMFC, SIDLAGHATTA AND ETC.,

¶39

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶40

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

¶41

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶42

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.

¶43

The said memo is placed on record.

¶44

NC: 2026:KHC:35010 RFA No. 1165 of 2026