Dismissed¶27

Sri Dayananda v. the Manager

Karnataka HC17 Apr 2026MFA.CROB/137/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru), MFA.CROB No.137/2017 (MV-I), decided 17.04.2026 by Lalitha Kanneganti J.; Dayananda v. The Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. & Sayyed Ghouse; cross objection under Order 41 Rule 22(1) CPC seeking enhancement of motor accident compensation awarded in MVC No.502/2015; dismissed as nothing survived after insurer's main appeal MFA No.6883/2016 allowed-in-part on 18.03.2021, compensation reduced from Rs.3,53,600/- to Rs.2,30,680/-; I.A.s closed.

What did the court decide?

In view of the main appeal MFA No.6883/2016 having been allowed-in-part (compensation reduced from Rs.3,53,600/- to Rs.2,30,680/-), nothing survives for consideration in the cross objection; accordingly the MFA.CROB is dismissed ¶27

Sri Dayananda Vs the Manager — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:21351 MFA.CROB No. 137 of 2017

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 137 OF 2017 (MV-I)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI DAYANANDA S/O. LATE. SHEENAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O. ULIPU HOUSE, KUTRUPPADY VILLAGE, KADABA POST, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT- 574 201

¶10

…CROSS OBJECTOR

¶11

(BY SRI. HAREESH BHANDARY T., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE MANAGER THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, 1^ST FLOOR, SHRI KSHETHRA DHARMASTHALA BUILDING, PUTTUR TALUK , D.K. DISTRICT- 574 201

¶14

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SRI. SAYYED GHOUSE S/O. PYAREJAN, R/O. D. NO. 154, 2ND CROSS, CHAMPAKA NAGARA, SAKLESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 134

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

THIS MFA.CROB IN MFA NO. 6883/2016 FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 22(1) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 27.04.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.502/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAKSHINA KANNADA, MANGALURU, SITTING AT PUTTUR, D.K., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CALIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:21351 MFA.CROB No. 137 of 2017

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

The MFA.CROB is listed for non-compliance of office

¶25

objections.

¶26

Learned counsel for the cross objector submits that the main appeal filed by the Insurance Company i.e., MFA.No.6883/2016 is allowed-in-part by order dated 18.03.2021, whereby the compensation is reduced from an amount of Rs.3,53,600/- to Rs.2,30,680/-. In the light of the same, it is submitted that nothing survives for consideration in this MFA.CROB.

¶27

Accordingly, the MFA.CROB is dismissed .

¶28

i. All I.As. in this MFA.CROB shall stand closed.

¶29

SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

¶30

MEG

¶31

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5

Sri Dayananda v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Dayananda v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daasta Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Hotel Industrialists Co. Operative Bank Ltd.

M/S Associate Lumbers Private Limited Vs Reserve Bank of India

Sri K.C. Nagaraj Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Mky Caterer Vs M/S Shriram Finance Ltd.

Mr. Syed Kaleem Vs Canara Bank

Indresh Vs State of Karnataka