Appeal under Section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act against a Family Court custody order. Counsel was given two weeks to remove office objections; non-compliance resulted in dismissal of the appeal without further reference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 9608 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI. Y.N.ARVIND, S/O NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O NO.31, SATHYAMARGA, SIDDARTHANAGAR LAYOUT, MYSURU.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VINAY N., NITHYANAND M. BHAT, SUMANTH M.S. ADVOCATES)
AND:
..RESPONDENTS
2
MFA No.9608/2025
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 47 of the GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT, 1890 against the Order passed in G & WC No.43/2023 on the file of the II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, at Mysuru.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections, failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court.
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.10.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T by: DS R by: NR C by: STE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Y.N. Arvind
Smt. M. Nikitha
Lishan Nanjegowda
Jayant Banerji
T.M.Nadaf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
