Dismissed¶¶31

Sri Byranna v. Smt. Bhagyamma

Karnataka HC19 Jun 2026MFA/8511/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, MFA No. 8511 of 2025 (CPC), Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur, judgment dated 19.06.2026. Maintainability of MFA against order dated 16.03.2012 on I.A. No.1 in O.S. No.262/2011 (I Addl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Nelamangala). Appeal valuation below Rs. 10,00,000/- attracts bar of Section 19(1), Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964; appeal dismissed as not maintainable; liberty reserved to approach appropriate forum; Limitation Act, 1963 exclusion of time before High Court.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as not maintainable; liberty reserved to the appellants to pursue permissible proceedings before the appropriate forum; time spent before this Court to be excluded under the Limitation Act, 1963. ¶¶31

Sri Byranna Vs Smt. Bhagyamma — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:30702 MFA No. 8511 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8511 OF 2025 (CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI BYRANNA

¶9

S/O. LATE NARASAIAH AGE ABOUT 55 YEARS.

¶10

SRI T. B. NARSEGOWDA S/O. BYRANNA AGE ABOUT 25 YEARS.

¶11

BOTH ARE R/AT THADASIGHATTA VILLAGE THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI NELAMLANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.

¶12

…APPELLANTS

¶13

(BY SRI R. SHAMA,ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

SMT. BHAGYAMMA D/O. LATE GANGANARASAMMA W/O. T. M. SIDDABYRAPPA AGE ABOUT 45 YEARS.

¶17

SMT. RATHNAMMA @ SIDDAGANGAMMA D/O. LATE GANGANARASAMMA W/O. S. C. MUTHEGOWDA AGE ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶18

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT THADASIGHATTA VILLAGE THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:30702 MFA No. 8511 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

BANGLORE RURAL DISTRICT.

¶23

SRI SRINIVAS S/O. LATE HANUMANTAHIAH AGE ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDENT AT OBALAPURA VILLAGE THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(R) OF THE CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.03.2012 PASSED ON I.A NO.1 IN O.S.NO.262/2011 BY I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA.

¶26

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

Registry has raised objection regarding

¶30

maintainability of the appeal on the ground that the valuation of the appeal is less than ₹10,00,000/- and

¶31

therefore, the appeal is barred under Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964. Hence, the objection raised by Registry is sustained. Consequently, the appeal is held to be not maintainable. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.

¶32

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:30702 MFA No. 8511 of 2025

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35