Appeal against interim injunction orders was dismissed for default as the appellant failed to appear despite multiple notices, with court notice returned undelivered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:1044 MFA No. 7693 of 2022
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7693 OF 2022 (IPR) BETWEEN:
M/S. VGD TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD., A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 102, OFC, DS 4/1, SAHAJANAND COMPLEX ADARSH SOCIETY, BEHIND BHAGWATI CHAMBER, CG ROAD, NAVRANGPURA AHMEDABAD - 380 009.
…APPELLANT
(NOTICES ISSUED TO APPELLANT)
AND:
M/S. GROWTHPOND TECHONOLOGY PVT. LTD., A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT D/403 ORCHID ENCLAVE, G.M. COLONY YADAV NAGAR, NAHAR AMRIT SHAKTI POWAI, MUMBAI - 400 072
CORPORATE OFFICE AT 18, OZONE RESINDZA 3/3, EASTWOOD TWP
NC: 2026:KHC:1044 MFA No. 7693 of 2022
HC-KAR
MAIN HARALUR ROAD NEAR SOBHA CLASSIC HSR, BENGALURU - 560 102 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. SUBASH CHANDRA CHOUDHARY.
…RESPONDENT
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.08.2022 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 AND 4 IN O.S.NO.370/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, (CCH NO.10), ALLOWING IA NO.1 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC, DISMISSING IA NO.4 FILED U/O.39 RULE 4 OF CPC.
THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
ORAL JUDGMENT
NC: 2026:KHC:1044 MFA No. 7693 of 2022
HC-KAR
today either, the appeal is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA
(TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution given the appellant's absence and unserved notice.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. VGD Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. Growthpond Techonology Pvt. Ltd.
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
